The Literature of the 1727 New England Earthquake

Journal article by William D. Andrews; Early American Literature, Vol. 7, 1973

Journal Article Excerpt


THE LITERATURE OF
THE 1727
NEW ENGLAND EARTHQUAKE

William D. Andrews

OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY

The summer Of 1727 was uncommonly hot in New England,
with strong winds and heavy rains, frequently accompanied by se-
vere lightning and thunder storms. In retrospect, Paul Dudley ob-
served that, "take it all together, I have never known so much hot
Weather in any one Summer in my Time."1 Good Puritans, condi-
tioned to perceive natural phenomena as providences of the Lord,
wondered what divine meaning the extraordinary weather might be-
token. For them an answer, of sorts, came on 29 October, sometime
around 10:40 p.m., when New England was shaken by the most se-
vere earthquake it had experienced. Apparently centered in New-
bury, Massachusetts, the quake was felt throughout New England and
at least as far south as Philadelphia. In Boston its effects were
dramatic, as described by Cotton Mather:

The Air never more Calm, the Sky never more Fair; every thing in all imaginable
Tranquility: But about a quarter of an Hour before Eleven, there was heard in
BOSTON, passing from one end of the Town to the other, an horrid rumbling like
the Noise many Coaches together, driving on the paved Stones with a most awful
Trembling of the Earth, which did heave and shake so as to Rocque the Houses,
and cause here and there the falling of some smaller Things, both within Doors
and without.2

When all accounts were in, it was discovered that, despite exten-
sive property damage, no one had died. That fact, to contemporar-
ies, was as pregnant with meaning as the quake itself. Since for the
Puritan the uninterpreted event (particularly one of the magnitude of
the 1727 earthquake) was not worth experiencing, theology as much
as common sense demanded analysis and explanation. At regularly
scheduled lectures and on specially proclaimed fast and thanksgiving
days, New England ministers accepted the challenge that the earth-
quake presented, wheeled out the machinery of analysis and set to
work explaining the ways of God to his people. The Boston presses
reacted almost seismographically, producing within a few months
twenty-six publications in which the effects of the quake can be

-281-

measured in intellectual terms.3 In these publications both natur­
al philosophy and theology were employed in the task of explaining
the earthquake in a manner consistent with current naturalistic and
religious definitions of reality; these attempts at explanation--in effect,
efforts to maintain the coherence of the Puritan worldview--illumin­
ate a series of issues relevant to a broader understanding of Ameri­
can culture in the first half of the eighteenth century.


I

It would be naïve to search in the literature of the 1727 earth­
quake for a fully developed scientific analysis of the phenomenon;
while almost all the published sermons address themselves in varying
ways to issues of causation, such concern is uniformly subordinate
to theological interest and the practical demands of deriving appli­
cable religious lessons from the earthquake. Throughout the early
years of the eighteenth century Christian apologists maneuvered to
mesh the new science with the orthodoxies of revealed religion, con­
ventionally viewing natural philosophy as the "handmaiden" of
religion.4 Although Puritan interest in science was always high,
it must be recalled in the following discussion that scientific analy­
sis was always secondary to the religious.

One measure of the impact of the scientific method on minis­
ters attempting to interpret the 1727 earthquake is the concern they
all manifested for measuring its effects. Catalogs of destroyed build­
ings, reports of firsthand observations, detailed accounts of smells
and sounds associated with the quake--these all find their place in
the published sermons. Clearly such response to a natural phenom­
enon reflects concern for scientific analysis: the collection and evalu­
ation of evidence illustrate the predominant Baconian method of
gathering "instances" that would eventually lead to theories of ex­
planation.

Of greater interest, though, to the historian of science are the
similar efforts most ministers expended on the study of the causes of
the earthquake. If the collection of physical evidence of the effects
of the quake may be dismissed as a refinement of the "remarkable
providences" approach, the serious inquiry into causation has to be
seen as proof of the scientific attitude most ministers assumed toward
the event. In their study of causation, the writers occupied rather
fortunate ground: no scientifically "orthodox" theory of the causes
of earthquakes existed as either a bar to further speculation or as an
...


 To continue reading this publication, you must have a Questia Subscription.

Try Us Today! Click Here

Questia provides the world's largest online library of scholarly books and journal articles, with integrated footnote and bibliography tools, highlighting, note taking and book marking. With a Questia subscription, you'll have access to the full text of more than 67,000 books and 1.5 million articles.

Already a subscriber? Login:

Sponsored Links
Read more than 5,000 classic books FREE!
Free Newsletter
Get helpful how-to's, writing tips, search strategies, quizzes & more!
Search the Library

Customize your search: Search within the topic


Search in:
Books Journals Magazines
Newspapers Encyclopedia Research Topics
  • Type your specific word or phrase in the box above after the word and, then click Search.
  • Put exact phrases in double quotation marks. Do not put single words in quotation marks.
Back to top



Sponsored Link