Children's Fright Reactions to Television News

Journal article by Joanne Cantor, Amy I. Nathanson; Journal of Communication, Vol. 46, 1996

Journal Article Excerpt


Children's Fright Reactions to
Television News

by Joanne Cantor and Amy I. Nathanson, University of Wisconsin-Madison

In a random survey of parents of kindergarten, second, fourth,
and sixth grade children, 37% of the children were reported to
have been frightened or upset by a news story on television. The
percentage of children being frightened by news increased
from kindergarten to the elementary school years, whereas the
tendency to be frightened by fantastic, unreal content showed
a decreasing trend. The top categories of stories producing fear
were violence between strangers, foreign wars and famines,
and natural disasters. The tendency to respond with fright to
violence between strangers increased with age, and the ten-
dency to be upset by natural disasters decreased with age.
Proposed explanations for the observed age differences were
based on developmental differences in children's understand-
ing of the fantasy-reality distinction and in their responsive-
ness to perceptually salient stimuli.

The bombing of the Federal Building in Oklahoma City in April of 1995 is one
in a stream of horrifying news stories that seem to have provoked fear in chil-
dren. Although young children are not avid news watchers, a recent report re-
vealed that network news earned an average of 1.3 Nielsen rating points among
2-to 11-year-old children in February of 1995 ( Stipp, 1995). This means that the
average minute of network news is seen by almost 500,000 children in this age
group. 1 Obviously, children watch news much less frequently than top-rated

____________________
1 According to Stipp ( 1995), one ratings point for 2-to 11-year-olds translates to 380,000 child viewers
in these data.

Joanne Cantor is professor of communication arts at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, where
Amy 1. Nathanson is a doctoral student. Portions of this study were supported by a Vilas Associates
Grant to the first author from the University of Wisconsin Graduate School. An earlier version of this
paper was presented before the International Communication Association, Albuquerque, NM, May
1995. The authors would like to thank Jason Anderson, Tammy Bloom, Jill Braverman, Dana Gross,
Kristen Harrison, Krista Jorgensen, Mike Keranen, Marina Krcmar, Jennifer Leff, Joanne Leighty,
Stacy Marmorek, Steve Moyle, Jessica Mudge, Chris Newman, Jordan Richman, Else-Marie
Rombouts, Nancy Senzer, Jill Shapiro, Joshua Sipkin, Tricia Tenenbaum, Lisa Vance, Marion van
Dam, Karen Vernell, and Sara Ward for conducting the telephone interviews in this article.

Copyright © 1996 Journal of Communication 46(4), Autumn. 0021-9916/96/$5.00

-139-

shows such as Step by Step and Full House, which earned ratings of 18 and 16,
respectively, in the same ratings period. On the other hand, they are much
more likely to be exposed to network news than to the syndicated News for
Kids,
which earned a 0.5 rating during the same ratings period. It is clear that
the news is included in the television diet of many children. Even if children do
not select the news themselves, they may still be affected by news stories that
their parents are watching.

In the spring of 1981, Cantor and Sparks ( 1984 ) did a mail survey, asking
parents of children in preschool, first grade, and fourth grade to name the "tele­
vision shows, movies, books, comics, etc., that had caused the most fear, upset,
sleep disturbances, or worried questions" in their child. Although news had not
been foreseen as a category, television news was in the top 10 in terms of its
frequency in the respondents' replies.

In 1991, Cantor, Mares, and Oliver ( 1993 ) studied children's emotional reac­
tions to news more systematically, by exploring children's reactions to the major
disturbing news of the year, the United States' participation in the war in the
Persian Gulf. It was found that 25% of a random sample of parents spontane­
ously mentioned the Gulf War as a televised event that had frightened their
child. In response to a follow-up that specifically asked about TV coverage of
the war, an additional 20% of the sample answered that it had frightened their
child, bringing the total percentage of children reportedly upset by TV coverage
of the war to 45%. In addition, there were developmental differences in the as­
pects of the news coverage that prompted the emotional reactions. Parents of
children in the younger two groups focused on the visual images that were up­
setting (e.g., "the weapons shown," "seeing people dying"). In contrast, parents of
the older group said that the more abstract issues of the war (e.g., fear of nuclear
war, "the reality of bombs and killing") were what had ...



















 To continue reading this publication, you must have a Questia Subscription.

Try Us Today! Click Here

Questia provides the world's largest online library of scholarly books and journal articles, with integrated footnote and bibliography tools, highlighting, note taking and book marking. With a Questia subscription, you'll have access to the full text of more than 67,000 books and 1.5 million articles.

Already a subscriber? Login:

Sponsored Links
Read more than 5,000 classic books FREE!
Free Newsletter
Get helpful how-to's, writing tips, search strategies, quizzes & more!
Search the Library

Customize your search: Search within the topic


Search in:
Books Journals Magazines
Newspapers Encyclopedia Research Topics
  • Type your specific word or phrase in the box above after the word and, then click Search.
  • Put exact phrases in double quotation marks. Do not put single words in quotation marks.
Back to top



Sponsored Link