Byline: Bruce Fein, SPECIAL TO THE WASHINGTON TIMES
President Bush honors federalism more in the breach than in the observance, contrary to his vocal celebration of states' rights as a candidate in the 2000 campaign.
Principles of local choice and experimentation have regularly succumbed to national political expediency, proving that the more things change in the White House, the more they stay the same. Emblematic has been Attorney General John Ashcroft's crusade to void Oregon's Death With Dignity Act (DWDA) under a federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA) banner, a coup de main which was defeated last week by the United States Court of Appeals for the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in State of Oregon vs. Ashcroft (May 26, 2004).
The Supreme Court denied a constitutional right to physician-assisted suicide in Washington vs. Glucksburg (1997). In a concurring opinion, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor saluted the entrustment of that wrenching issue to the states because both moral and practical knowledge is slender: "States are presently undertaking extensive and serious evaluation of physician-assisted suicide. ... In such circumstances, the ... challenging task of crafting appropriate procedures for safeguarding ... liberty interests is entrusted to the 'laboratory' of states ... in the first instance."
In 1994, the State of Oregon enacted by ballot measure the nation's trailblazing law authorizing physician assisted suicide. The DWDA permits the prescription of lethal doses of controlled substances to terminally ill Oregon residents safeguarded by procedures to protect the vulnerable from coercion or undue influence. For instance, patients must sign a written request for the prescription in the presence of two witnesses attesting to their competence and the lack of duress. In 1997, Oregon voters reaffirmed the DWDA after meticulous debate and scrutiny by opposing a referendum seeking its repeal.
Oregon's pioneering endorsement of physician-assisted suicide has proven unalarming. The annual number of lethal prescriptions has averaged approximately 30, accounting for one-seventh of 1 percent of Oregon deaths.
Moreover, convincing studies have discredited the fretting that the poor, ill-educated, or uninsured would disproportionately resort to assisted suicide.
At present, no sister state jurisdiction has emulated Oregon's example. Some desire more empirical data. Others have been unpersuaded by the moral case for individual choice when inescapable death and parting memories impending. States, however, remain free to alter their physician-assisted suicide policies as citizen education, colloquy, and advocacy dictate. Oregon itself might somersault if the DWDA comes to suggest previously undiscerned or unappreciated moral shortcomings.
Several members of Congress sporting pro-life credentials, including then-Sen. John …