Purpose of the Study
The purpose of the research was to provide a better understanding of the impacts of relevant information on consumers' emotions when bidding their prices through an online Name-Your-Own-Price (NYOP) method. Specifically, the study examined 1) whether the availability of reference prices increases consumers' comfort during the price-bidding process; and 2) whether consumers feel more regret about a negative outcome when reference prices are available.
Background and Theoretical Framework
Compared with the huge amount of literature dealing with how people think, and should think, about their decisions (the cognitive domain), the research on how people feel (the affective domain) about the decision process and its outcomes is limited. Regret is the emotion that has received the most attention from decision researchers. The theoretical framework used in this study was the Decision Justification Theory (DJT), a regret model proposed by Connolly and Zeelenberg (2002). According to the theory, the key determinant of the feeling of regret is whether or not a person feels his/her decisions are well justified. The current study aimed to test if the absence of reference price information plays a role in the process of consumers justifying a negative outcome from their decisions and alleviating their feeling of regret.
The principal hypothesis of this study was that the availability of reference prices affects consumers' emotions during the decision process and after knowing the outcome is negative. The methods in this study were designed to examine consumers' price-bidding behavior and emotions via a simulated market strategy, that is, the online NYOP method. Two experiments were designed to test three research hypotheses.
The following conclusions can be drawn: 1) during the price bidding process, consumers feel more comfortable when reference prices are available than when reference prices are not available; 2) when the outcome is negative, consumers feel more regret when reference prices are available than when they are …