Newspaper article The Washington Times (Washington, DC)
Byline: Jennifer Haberkorn, THE WASHINGTON TIMES
Top House Democrats on Tuesday left open the prospect of President Obama's comprehensive health care overhaul failing and passing pieces of it, a process already being used to try to repeal health insurance industry antitrust protections.
The antitrust measure, which was not in the reform framework Mr. Obama released Monday, could pass the House Wednesday with bipartisan support, which would mark the first time Republicans and Democrats have been able to agree in the health debate. It would come a day ahead of Mr. Obama's health summit.
House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer said Democrats support Mr. Obama's outline, but if a complete overhaul bill can't get through Congress, there are good pieces that should become law.
We may not be able to do it all, he said. I hope we can do it all in a comprehensive piece of legislation that would provide affordable, accessible, quality health care to all Americans. But having said that, if we can't, then you know me - if you can't do a whole, doing part is also good.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi stressed the importance of repealing the antitrust protections and that Democrats can simultaneously pass a small bill alongside work on the comprehensive bill.
We will be taking up comprehensive health insurance reform shortly but we wanted to make sure that in paving the way for that legislation we paved the way for fairness, for competition, for better care, better quality, better affordability for the American people, she said.
The antitrust bill repeals the 1945 McCarran-Ferguson Act that exempted the insurance industry from federal antitrust rules.
For too may decades the health insurance companies have enjoyed monopoly protections that are enjoyed really by no other industry, with the exception of Major League Baseball, said Rep. Tom Perriello, the Virginia Democrat who introduced the bill. The result of this has been a lack of competition and a lack of accountability that has helped send prices up for consumers and working families across the country.
It's unclear what impact the repeal would have. Democrats say it would increase competition and stop bid rigging and price fixing. Insurance companies oppose it because they say it would lead to regulatory confusion and that state law already prevents anticompetitive practices.
The Congressional Budget Office, Congress' nonpartisan budgetkeeper, found that the repeal would have no significant effects on the federal budget or private insurance premiums.
Insurers say McCarran-Ferguson never allowed them to engage in price-fixing or bid-rigging. …