R&D highlights of the trade bill
A bill aimed at strengthening the competitiveness of U.S. companies and reducing trade deficits passed the Congress last week. At press time, this Omnibus Trade Bill awaited President Reagan's signature. Tariff changes, the pending law's possible effects on new foreign-trade agreements, and an expanded definition of unfair trade practices that can trigger U.S. sanctions have dominated most discussions of this bill. However, a hodgepodge of less closely followed provisions in the 1,128-page legislative document could affect the U.S. research and development (R&D) community more directly.
Chief among them are two involving intellectual-property rights. Currently, importation of foreign products that infringe on federally issued patents, trademarks and copyrights can be banned -- but only after it has been shown that importing the product would likely injure an efficiently operated U.S. industry. Under the new legislation, such proof of injury is no longer needed to ban infringing products.
A second change would for the first time allow holders of U.S. patents for processes to sue for damages those firms that either made or imported into the United States products manufactured by infringers of their patents.
The new law would also rename the National Bureau of Standards (NBS) in Gaithersburg, Md., and expand its functions. The new Natioanl Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is slated to continue NBS' current research activities -- largely the development of measurement standards and related technologies -- while taking on several advanced-technology-outreach responsibilities.
NIST is scheduled to launch regional technology-transfer centers, for example. It also would coordinate a national technology-extension service, encourage the development of industrial consortia to exploit scientific and technological advances, and operate a national information clearinghouse on state and local technology initiatives. …