IN 10 tumultuous days, the divided city of Jerusalem has provided a troubled backdrop to a deterioration in United States-Israeli relations and a British diplomatic fiasco.
In the tense, bitter aftermath of the Oct. 8 killing of at least 20 Palestinians by Israeli security forces, international attention has once again been focused on a city claimed by both Arab and Jew.
Israel regards Jerusalem as its eternal, undivided capital, and this has fueled Israeli resentment against the UN and Washington, which do not recognize Israel's annexation of East Jerusalem.
For Israel, the Bush administration's sins are twofold. First, it supported UN Security Council Resolution 672, which condemns the recent killings, and backs the decision to send a UN delegation to Jerusalem to investigate.
Then the administration pressed Israel to guarantee it would not use US funds to build housing in the city's Arab sector.
"We insist on the sovereignty of Jerusalem," said Deputy Foreign Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Tuesday. "We think that the sending of (an investigative) delegation would impinge on that sovereignty."
Washington's perceived challenge to that sovereignty led Yosef Goell, a senior staff writer on the Jerusalem Post, to conclude in a recent column that the Bush administration is the least friendly American administration since the 1950s and is "pushing the Likud government into ... a collision course" with the US.
Shortly after Israel's Cabinet challenged Washington by rejecting the UN probe, Housing Minister Ariel Sharon announced plans to build 5,000 apartments for new Soviet immigrants in Arab East Jerusalem.
In response, the US made public an earlier letter to Secretary of State James Baker III by Foreign Minister David Levy.
The letter promised that, in return for $400 million in US-backed housing-loan guarantees, Israel would not settle Soviet Jewish immigrants beyond the "green line," Israel's pre-1967 borders. …