Article excerpt

The following notes of judgments were prepared by the reporters of the All England Law Reports.


Re Chetta; QBD Div Ct (Pill LJ, Astill J) 30 April 1997. A person seeking to apply under s 16 of the Extradition Act 1989 was not required to give notice to the Home Secretary of his intention prior to the expiry of the one month period from the date that the s 12 warrant had been issued. It was not open to applicants to dress up the statutory claim under s 16 as an application for a writ of habeas corpus in order to improve their procedural position. Section 16 merely conferred the detainee with a right to apply to the court, and did not constitute a challenge to the lawfulness of the decision. The applicants in person; Rabinder Singh (Treasury Solicitor) for the Home Secretary; Julian Knowles (CPS) for the Government of Canada. Evidence R v Waters; CA Cr Div (Kennedy LJ, Harrison J, Nelson J) 18 February 1997. Where a witness started to give relevant evidence but was then unable to continue apparently through fear, the trial judge was correct in admitting in evidence the witness's earlier statement pursuant to s 23(1) and (3)(b) of the Criminal Justice Act 1988, because such further relevant evidence, which the witness was expected to, but did not, give came within the provisions of s 23. …