Big-state governors illustrate push toward managed Medicaid behavioral health care
As more Republican governors decide to expand Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), the nature of Medicaid itself may be changing. Instead of the old fee-for-service reimbursement method that many behavioral health providers were used to, the new scenario is going to be managed care. Medicaid is already privatized for medical/surgical services in many states. But substance abuse and mental illness were separate in many states, and providers were happy to be paid on a fee-for-service basis. Now, apparently, expanded Medicaid is just too big to take on without private insurance companies managing the benefit.
Take the cases ofNew Jersey and Florida, where two governors who had argued long and hard against Medicaid expansion - and all of "Obamacare" - changed their minds recently to the approval of the behavioral healthcare community. In Florida, Gov. Rick Scott said that he would accept the federal dollars to fund a Medicaid expansion. He did this just hours after the state received a Medicaid waiver which will move all of its Medicaid behavioral health treatment services into managed care.
The prospect of soon having private, forprofit insurance companies managing Medicaid benefits worries treatment providers, who have not always had positive experiences with managed care companies. "All substance abuse treatment today is fee-for-service, but starting next October, it will be managed care," Mark Fontaine, executive director of the Florida Alcohol and Drug Abuse Association (FADAA), told Behavioral Healthcare. ThelDN (Integrated Delivery Network) will include all mental health and substance abuse services.
For behavioral health providers who serve people on Medicaid, the good news about support for the expansion is tempered by the bad news about the addition of managed care. "The managed care companies have to carve their 15 percent off the top, and there's no new money, so what they're saying is there will have to be efficiencies," said Fontaine. "This means more rationed care."
There are also questions about residential treatment, because Medicaid doesn't pay for residential treatment, said Fontaine.
Governor Scott had made no secret of the fact that the expansion of Medicaid was linked to whether he could use private insurance companies to manage behavioral healthcare. Only hours after the federal government said he could privatize Medicaid, he announced that he would expand it. Privatization will occur right away for the current Medicaid recipients - 3 million in the state, more than half of whom are under 21.
Under Medicaid expansion, single men without children will, for the first time in many years, get health care coverage, with the federal government paying 100 percent of the tab for the first three years. Governor Scott only wants to expand the program for as long as the government is paying the full tab - through 2016. There will be 900,000 additional recipients - not only men, but people earning up to 133 percent of federal poverty level - under the expansion. If the expansion doesn't continue beyond three years, what would happen to them? The federal government has indicated that it will be flexible if states want to drop out.
For-profit insurance companies
It can be expected that Governor Scott wants to reduce the cost of care. The state has already run afoul of the federal parity law, with the insurance commissioner refusing to make private insurance companies comply with parity in mental health and substance abuse treatment in the state. The federal Department of Health and Human Services has reportedly been working behind the scenes with states like Florida that are recalcitrant on parity.
The nub of the managed-care-for- Medicaid concern is this: the insurance companies are for-profit, and they are getting …