History - in its broadest sense, is the story of humanity's past. It also refers to the recording of that past. The diverse sources of history include books, newspapers, printed documents, personal papers, and other archival records, artifacts, and oral accounts. Historians use this material to form coherent narratives and uncover linked sequences and patterns in past events. Most histories are concerned with causality, that is, why certain outcomes happened as they did, and how they are linked to earlier events.
Origins of Historical Writing In preliterate societies, the accounts of the past are related orally, and many cultures have produced intricate and sophisticated oral histories. African peoples have long relied on oral histories to learn about their past. Starting with the medieval Islamic kingdoms of Africa some of these oral chronicles were recorded in Arabic, and sub-Saharan Africa developed its own written histories. In the 1550s the
Popol Vuh, an elaborate account of the history and mythology of the Quiché people in Mexico, was recorded in Spanish. In the older civilizations, as in Egypt, Mesopotamia, and China, historical records appear immediately after the appearance of writing, for conquering kings wished to record their triumphs for all posterity. There was also some interest in the remote past, particularly genealogical interest in the glorification of royal ancestors and their achievements. There appears early, too, a strain of religious interest in showing the lessons of history, religious and ethical. Thus the early historical sections of the Bible are concerned with the manifestation of God's will in the events of human existence, while they show the same genealogical interests as the king lists of other peoples. Western Historiography Greek and Roman Historiography It was not until the time of the Greeks that historiography, the writing of organic history, emerged. The compilations of the logographoi in the 6th cent. b.c. were organized records. It is with some justice, however, that
Herodotus is considered the first historian, because in his work appears the conscious desire to record all the significant and noteworthy circumstances surrounding a set of events and motivating the actions of people in those events. Herodotus was remarkable, too, for the scope of his interests; he recorded myths, described customs, and made speculations. He used much unverified information, however, and failed to differentiate clearly between fact and fable. The second great Greek historian,
Thucydides, was of a different stamp. In writing the history of the Peloponnesian War he limited himself to matters of state and war; he tried to establish chronology and facts with some exactitude, avoiding the digressions of Herodotus; though his attempt at writing a factual and impartial history was not entirely successful, he wrote a grave work, conveying the lessons he drew from his story. The third of the great Greek historians,
Xenophon, was more devoted to the purely storytelling aspects of history. The influence of Thucydides was early in the ascendant, and the two important Greek historians of the Roman period,
Polybius and
Dio Cassius, more or less modeled themselves on that master. The Roman historian
Livy was more of a teller of tales, and he invoked the intervention of the gods to explain cause and effect. The great commentaries of Julius
Caesar were more like inspired reporting than pure history writing, and the personal element in them was strong.
Tacitus followed more or less the pattern of Thucydides but with a brooding moral interest in the decay of Roman society. Medieval Historiography The concern with separating fact from fiction and legend often disappeared in medieval historiography. Medieval works tended to divide into two types of histories. One was the universal history, which found some inspiration in St. Augustine's City of God; it was outstandingly illustrated by Paulus
Orosius and continued by such lesser men as
Isidore of Seville. The other was the chronicle, ranging from the crude and simple annals of local monasteries to more orderly and organized accounts such as those of
Saxo Grammaticus,
Otto of Freising,
Roger of Wendover, and
Matthew of Paris. The two forms were not infrequently mixed. Attempts at broader histories of peoples, such as the history of the Goths by
Cassiodorus (preserved only in the compendium of
Jordanes) and the history of the Franks by
Gregory of Tours, were early and had few successors. The chronicles tended to be parochial. Since learning was restricted to the church, the chroniclers were generally biased in favor of the church, and often they were little concerned with politics and secular rule. Among the better medieval histories was Bede's Ecclesiastical History, an early model in a branch of historiography that has been of great importance. The biographical or semibiographical accounts of knightly deeds in the Crusades gave rise to the critical history of
William of Tyre. Contact with Byzantines and Muslims broadened history writing by showing the Westerners other points of view. Byzantine historians had also early fallen into the writing of chronicles, although the greater unity of the Byzantine Empire and the persistence of a unified culture gave somewhat more literary quality to the Byzantine works, from
Procopius through
Anna Comnena to the 13th-century writings of George Acropolita and the Acominatus brothers. Medieval Islamic historians such as al-Tabari and al-Masudi wrote histories of great scope, often employing sophisticated methods to separate fact from fable. But by far the greatest medieval Arabic historian was Ibn Khaldun, who created an early version of sociological history to account for the rise and decline of cities and civilizations. In 12th-century Europe secular history writing emerged, shown in the work of Geoffroi de
Villehardouin, and the chronicles of Jean, sire de
Joinville, Jean
Froissart, and Philippe de
Comines in successive centuries. Renaissance Historiography The humanism of the Renaissance revolutionized historiography, for it placed emphasis on textual criticism and on a critical attitude toward documents and sources. Men such as
Petrarch, Lorenzo
Valla,
Marsilius of Padua, and Juan Luis
Vives did much to produce a more critical attitude toward the past. Revival of classical learning immediately affected historians, and in one sense Niccolò
Machiavelli and Francesco
Guicciardini followed in the steps of Greek and Roman historians, although their work was original and immediate. Both the Reformation and the Catholic Reformation furthered historical scholarship, as both sides used the past to support their religious views. Critical methods in history were forwarded in the 16th and 17th cent. by the writings of Jean
Bodin and Jean
Mabillon, and great critical collections of sources were begun (e.g., the Acta sanctorum), while antiquaries everywhere discovered, questioned, and emended old texts. The way was prepared for the beginning of modern history. History in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries The historians of the Enlightenment wrote broad accounts of social and cultural epochs.
Voltaire cultivated the wider, universal view of history, stressing its social and moral aspects. The attempt to get back to the fundamental natural bases of human development was implicit in the Esprit des lois of
Montesquieu. The 18th cent. saw, too, the great attempt made by Giovanni Battista
Vico to synchronize history into meaningful general patterns. From England came the masterful work of Edward
Gibbon, combining erudition with the philosophical concerns of the 18th cent. on the rise and decline of civilization. The end of the century also brought the budding of archaeology out of antiquarianism and of philology out of classical scholarship. These two sciences were essential to the development, in the 19th cent., of critical objective history as an academic discipline. The father of the new objective school was the great Leopold von
Ranke. His efforts and those of his successors, notably Theodor
Mommsen, Johann Gustav
Droysen, and Heinrich von
Treitschke, established canons of criticism and historical methods. This German school made history writing into a profession and founded the formal academic study of history, though they fell short of their ideal of writing about the past "as it actually happened." In France, modern academic history began with Numa Denis
Fustel de Coulanges. It was continued by such men as Ernest
Lavisse, Charles
Seignobos, and Achille
Luchaire, who were among those who turned history into a wide study. In the 19th cent. the history of the nation state became the dominant form of history writing. Among the more prominent romantic national historians were Thomas B.
Macaulay in England, and Jules
Michelet in France. In the United States, romantic historians, such as George
Bancroft, William H.
Prescott, John L.
Motley, and Francis
Parkman were followed by such brilliant and questioning men as Henry
Adams. The broader interest in the philosophy of history had not died, and the philosophy of Georg Wilhelm Friedrich
Hegel had created a school of idealistic historians. Other philosophical views were reflected in general theories, some of the later figures being Oswald
Spengler, Benedetto
Croce, and Arnold
Toynbee. The theories of Karl
Marx not only set in motion a continuing series of interpretations of history from the Marxist economic point of view but also affected historians of all other schools. The progressive school of U.S. historians, such as Frederick J.
Turner, emphasized social and economic factors in explaining historical development, as did the "new history" of James Harvey
Robinson and Charles A.
Beard. The trend was toward broader social and economic history. History in the Twentieth Century The trend toward | 
