Academic journal article NBER Reporter
NBER Research Associate Nancy L. Rose of MIT organized a conference on Economic Regulation that took place on September 9 and 10 m Cambridge. The following papers were discussed:
Dennis Carlton, University of Chicago and NBER. and Randal Picker, University of Chicago, "Antitrust and Regulation Discussant: Timothy Bresnahan, Stanford University and NBER
Paul Joskow, MIT and NBER, "Incentive Regulation in Theory and Practice: Electricity Distribution and Transmission Networks" Discussant: David Sappington, University of Florida
Jerry Hausman, MIT and NBER. and J. Gregory Sidak, American Enterprise Institute, "Telecommunications Regulation: Current Approaches with the End in Sight"
Discussant: Joseph Farrell, University of California, Berkeley
Frank Wolak, Stanford University and NBER, "Regulating Competition in Wholesale Electricity Supply" Discussant: Catherine Wolfram, University of California, Berkeley and NBER
Severin Borenstein, University of California, Berkeley and NBER, and Nancy L. Rose, "Regulatory Reform in the Airline Industry" Discussant: Steven Berry, Yale University and NBER
Randall Kroszner, University of Chicago and NBER, and Philip Strahan, Boston College and NBER, "Regulation and Deregulation of the U.S. Banking Industry: Causes, Consequences, and Implications for the Future"
Discussant: Charles Calomiris, Columbia University and NBER Gregory Crawford, University of Arizona, "Cable Television: Does Cable Need to be Regulated Any More?"
Discussant: Tasneem Chipty, CRA International
Patricia Danzon, University of Pennsylvania and NBER, and Eric Keuffel, University of Pennsylvania, "Regulation of the Pharmaceutical Industry"
Discussant: Ernst Berndt, MIT and
Eric Zitzewitz, Stanford University, "Financial Regulation in the Aftermath of the Bubble"
Discussant: Jonathan Macey, Yale University
Roberton Williams, University of Texas at Austin and NBER, "Market-Based Environmental Regulation" Discussant: Erin Mansur, Yale University
The past thirty years have witnessed an extraordinary transformation of government intervention in broad segments of the economy, both in the United States and in many other nations. Many industries historically subject to economic regulation, particularly those in multi-firm sectors such as trucking, airlines, and banking, have been largely deregulated. "Natural monopoly" industries, such as electricity and telecommunications, have been restructured, and traditional regulation or state ownership has been replaced by market-based institutions. Much of this reform movement was supported by economic analyses that highlighted the inefficiencies of historical regulatory policies and suggested the prospect of substantial gains from regulatory reform. Early studies of the aftermath of deregulation confirmed many of the anticipated benefits, particularly in structurally competitive sectors, and may have spurred extension of regulatory reform to other industries. In recent years, however, some have challenged the wisdom of those policies, even proposing the reintroduction of regulation in some sectors.
This National Bureau of Economic Research project analyzes the performance of regulatory reform and restructuring across a broad group of industries and settings. The papers at this conference provide an overview of key issues surrounding economic regulation and assessment of the economic consequences of regulatory reforms over the past three decades, and discuss some of the most significant contemporary concerns about these reforms.
More than a century ago, Carlton and Picker note, the federal government started regulating competition, first railroads through the Interstate Commerce Act and then the general economy under the Sherman Act. The former assigned primary responsibility to the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC), while the Sherman Act relied for its implementation on federal courts. …