As long as the global supply of tissues, cells and organs for transplant does not meet needs, desperate patients are easy prey for unscrupulous individuals. Yet countries including Spain and the United States of America have shown that it is possible to make progress towards self sufficiency in transplants by meeting these needs with altruistic donations. Achieving national self-sufficiency is not easy. It requires a level of commitment from society that very few countries have been able to garner, but building this commitment arguably costs much less in the long term than relying on the payment of "volunteers"--inevitably the poor and vulnerable.
In contrast to organs, most human tissues and cells destined for transplantation can be processed, preserved and stored, often for long periods. Their transportation can be very easy and shipping across national boundaries is sometimes necessary to best meet patients' needs. Risks of ethical breaches arise at all stages; from consent to donation through to the allocation of transplants, and the clinical care of donors and receipients. Recent cases of cadaveric tissue theft have shown how unethical behaviour in tissue procurement bypasses the safety barriers designed to decrease the risk of transmitting infectious diseases to receipents. (1,2) The international circulation of human cells and tissues may also be an opportunity for hefty profit. Those who wish to profit from this trade do so by taking advantage of both poor people and their need for income, and of wealthy patients' needs and their ability to pay.
The international organ trade is widely referred to as "transplant tourism". This entails cross-border travel by any participant in transplantation (recipients and/or surgeons and/or live donors) for the purpose of obtaining an organ in exchange for cash or goods. The profit motive predominates in this trade, more than the interest of the patients, and care for the live organ donor is secondary or non-existent.
This issue of the Bulletin contains two papers on transplantation: the first is dedicated to the ethical aspects of cell and tissue transplantation, (3) the second is an attempt to produce a picture of the international organ trade. (4)
Both papers are outputs of WHO's consultation process in response to Resolution 57.18 of the 2004 World Health Assembly on updating the 1991 Guiding Principles for Human Organ Transplantation. Resolution 57.18 requested WHO's Director-General to collect global data on all aspects of transplantation--including ethical issues. With the support of the Spanish government, WHO has contributed to a global knowledge base on transplantation designed to document the global situation of legitimate transplantation from official sources in most Member States. (5)
However, there is no such official source of data on transplant tourism. This trade is illegal wherever relevant laws exist. Measuring the extent of this illicit trade is impossible, and Shimazono's paper (4) takes the necessary, but limited, first step of gathering available information in order to form a first estimate. This paper is further limited by its identification of transplant activities from publications and in only two languages. It does not attempt to quantify the activity of …