I would like to thank the Association for Evolutionary Economics (AFEE) for the 2008 Veblen-Commons Award which you have just given me. I would also like to thank Dale Bush, Glen Atkinson, Bill Dugger and the Award Committee for their role in bestowing the award.
Most of the recipients of this award attribute inspiration to the founders and popularizers of institutional economics such as Thorstein Veblen, John Dewey, Clarence Ayres and John R. Commons. I am no exception since my intellectual pedigree includes all these men and C. Wright Mills, too. But to this list I would like to add the name of Lenny Bruce whose book How to Talk Dirty and Influence People had a great impact on me as you shall soon see.
Before I get to the more formal part of my address, however, I would like to put the following questions to the audience. You need not raise your hands in answer to these queries! But, ask yourselves, how would you answer these questions if they were put to you directly and you were under obligation to answer them candidly?
1. How many of you voted for George Bush for President in either 2000 or 2004?
2. How many are registered Republicans and consider yourselves to be politically conservative?
3. How many of you attend church regularly and subscribe to either the Nicene or Apostles Creeds as a statement of your formal religious faith?
4. How many of you engage regularly in conspicuous consumption, deliberate waste, or conspicuous abstinence from socially useful labor?
It is unnecessary to count heads and keep records on how each of you voted as we have reached consensus without cumbersome democratic procedures. Let me now summarize the consensus which clearly shows that you are not conservatives, do not vote Republican, are not religious and are leery of violating the Veblenian imperatives!
Evolutionary naturalism underlies the political theory and social criticism of institutionalism and binds together these and other facets of its paradigmatic cosmology. It is from this philosophic underpinning that we hope to make it into a more politically and ideologically coherent movement. Or do we; that is the question? Many organizations take strong pledges against oppression and subjugation and in favor of social justice. This means the repudiation of sexism, racism, classism, homophobia, ageism and ethnocentrism among others. This, of course, raises the question of to what extent, or if, professional organizations like AFEE, ITVA (International Thorstein Veblen Association), AFIT (Association for Institutional Thought), and EAPE (European Association for Evolutionary Political Economy) should take binding stands on philosophic, moral and public policy issues? Or is it preferable simply to take the articulation of a statement of principles loosely construed as adequate? Probably few of us would require political and ideological litmus tests for entry into our ranks. Yet through self-selection and institutional breeding, we have acquired a considerable degree of doctrinal unity past, present and likely into what Veblen calls the "calculable future."
Institutional economists have often attempted to project or at least to discover some kind of unity within our ranks. In their presidential or award addresses such as this, they often announce their findings. Policy coherence, political convergence, common tradition and even cosmological unity are said to exist among us. To these I would add political and moral obligation stemming from the social nature of human existence which obliges us to engage in altruistic activities as a matter of individual deportment. There is a large and apparently growing number of charitable and service organizations with secular political and ideological objectives scattered along the left-liberal end of the doctrinal spectrum that many of us support. These range from the ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union), the Red Cross, and the coalitions to restrict firearms, to Amnesty International, Human Rights Witness, Care and Planned Parenthood ad infinitum. …