Generated from local file. Cache size:400 (not visible in beta/prod)
Read complete books and articles on: Voting Rights Act of 1965
At Questia, we offer:
- Exclusive access to more than
67,000
books and
1.5 million
articles.
- Trusted resources from leading publishers.
- Time saving tools to do better, faster research!
16 of the Best Books and Articles on: Voting Rights Act of 1965
as selected by Questia librarians
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Out of the Barrio: Toward a New Politics of Hispanic Assimilation
» Read Now
by Linda Chavez.
224 pgs.
This controversial book shatters the myth that twenty million Hispanics are a permanent underclass. Linda Chavez tells the largely untold story of Hispanic progress and achievement and considers the radical implications for bilingual education, immigration policy, and affirmative action.
-
-
-
-
-
-
The U.S. House of Representatives: Reform or Rebuild? (Chap. 8 "The Voting Rights Act and Supreme Court Restrictions on Majority-Minority Districts")
» Read Now
by Joseph F. Zimmerman, Wilma Rule.
248 pgs.
The U.S. House of Representatives vastly overrepresents white males and underrepresents "minorities" and women. This essay collection examines the causes of the unrepresentative character of the House and analyzes reform possibilities, including alternative electoral systems, enlargement of the...
The U.S. House of Representatives vastly overrepresents white males and underrepresents "minorities" and women. This essay collection examines the causes of the unrepresentative character of the House and analyzes reform possibilities, including alternative electoral systems, enlargement of the House, term limits, a new election campaign finance system, and more effective regulation of campaign contributions and expenditures.
-
Mistaken Identity: The Supreme Court and the Politics of Minority Representation (Chap. One "The Voting Rights Act and the Struggle for Meaningful Political Membership")
» Read Now
by Keith J. Bybee.
194 pgs.
Is it ever legitimate to redraw electoral districts on the basis of race? In its long struggle with this question, the U.S. Supreme Court has treated race-conscious redistricting either as a requirement of political fairness or as an exercise in corrosive racial quotas. Cutting through these...
Is it ever legitimate to redraw electoral districts on the basis of race? In its long struggle with this question, the U.S. Supreme Court has treated race-conscious redistricting either as a requirement of political fairness or as an exercise in corrosive racial quotas. Cutting through these contradictory positions, Keith Bybee examines the theoretical foundations of the Court's decisions and the ideological controversy those decisions have engendered. He uncovers erroneous assumptions about political identity on both sides of the debate and formulates new terms on which minority representation can be pursued.As Bybee shows, the Court has for the last twenty years encouraged a division between individualist and group concepts of political identity. He demonstrates convincingly that both individualist and group proponents share the misguided notion that political identity is formed prior to and apart from politics itself. According to Bybee, this "mistaken identity" should be abandoned for a more flexible, politically informed understanding of who the "people" really are. Thus, a misdirected debate will be replaced by a more considered discussion in which the people can speak for themselves, even as the Court speaks on their behalf. Engaged in the politics of minority representation, the Court will be able to help citizens articulate and achieve more fruitful forms of political community.
-
Back to top