vote in a union, the plant will close. Since many mill communities
are located in rural areas, as in the North, the effects of mill shutdowns are adverse, even devastating, for the workers and the
communities as a whole. Much capital movement has been to
other regions in the South, as well as overseas, where labor costs in
Third World areas sometimes comprise only one-seventh of U.S.
wages. As conditions that facilitate the mobility of textile capital
continuously improve, gains previously won by workers are
more likely to be lost. Hence many aspects of southern textile class
relations may take on characteristics of what occurred in the North.
That is, general processes of struggle, and responses of both capital and
labor to them, recur.
David Doane, "Regional Cost Differences and Textile Location: A Statistical
Analysis", Explanations in Economic History 9, no. 1 ( 1971), pp. 3-4.
John R. Earle,
Dean D. Knudson, and
Donald W. Shriver Jr., Spindles and
Spires ( Atlanta: John Knox Press, 1976), p. 189.
James Morris, "Cotton and Wool Textiles: Case Studies in Industrial
Migration", The Journal of Industrial Economics 2, no. 1 ( November 1953), p. 72. Dwight Billings
, in Planters and the Making of the New South ( Chapel Hill: University of
North Carolina Press, 1979), also sees the postwar period as a new boom for the
southern region. Between 1947 and 1962, manufacturing employment increased 42
percent, while the national average was only 13 percent (p. 30).
W. Stanley Devino,
Arnold H. Raphaelson, and
James A. Storer, A Study of
Textile Mill Closings in Selected New England Communities ( Orono: University of
Maine Press, 1966); William Miernyk and
Nadine P. Rodwin, Inter-Industry Labor
Mobility: The Case of the Displaced Textile Worker ( Boston: Northeastern
University, Bureau of Business and Economic Research, 1955). See also Charles Myers
George P. Schultz, The Dynamics of a Labor Market ( New York: Prentice-Hall, 1951); and Seymour Wolfbein, The Decline of a Cotton Textile Mill City ( New York: Columbia University Press, 1944).
5. C. B. J. Bomers, Multinational Corporations and Industrial Relations (Assen,
The Netherlands: Van Corcum Press, 1976), pp. 17-28; Charles Levinson, Capital,
Inflation and the Multinationals ( London: George Allen and Unwin, 1972), pp. 96-98.
These advantages to capital apply to both expansion within a nation-state
and beyond its borders. As a firm becomes a multinational company, however, these
advantages become more apparent because legal, financial, and cultural barriers, among
others, impede workers and unions from knowing the facts and hinder organizing
efforts. Most of the largest textile firms are multinationals, although their foreign
operations do not necessarily reach the proportions of the more celebrated ones, that is,
autos, electronics, and the like.
See Barry Bluestone and
Bennett Harrison, Capital and Communities
( Washington, D.C.: A Progressive Alliance Publication, 1980), pp. 107-139. Their
similar discussions on capital flight to the South and the textile industry can be found
in a later work, The Deindustrialization of America ( New York: Basic Books, 1982).
Harry Braverman, Labor and Monopoly Capital ( New York: Monthly
Review Press, 1974), pp. 79-82, for a more in-depth discussion of this principle.
See Fred Block, The Origins of International Economic Disorder ( Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977); David Landes, The Unbound Prometheus ( London:
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Book title: Capital-Labor Relations in the U.S. Textile Industry.
Contributors: Barry E. Truchil - Author.
Publisher: Praeger Publishers.
Place of publication: New York.
Publication year: 1988.
Page number: 85.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may
not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.