Modern Engendering: Critical Feminist Readings in Modern Western Philosophy

By Bat-Ami Bar On | Go to book overview
Save to active project

Marx and the Ideology of Gender:
A Paradox of Praxis and Nature

Wendy Lee-Lampshire

While ecofeminist and Marxist-feminist literature appear both vast in themselves and relatively unrelated to each other, some versions of each share in an ecologically motivated utopic vision very much in the spirit of Marx. 1 The key to this utopia lies in the Marxian concept of praxis for it is within this novel concept of creative activity that nature is alleged to be transformed without being exploited. The best hope for articulating a feminist-Marxist as well as an ecofeminist future, then, would seem to depend upon the discovery of a way to articulate praxis in more explicitly feminist terms. The aim of this paper, however, is to show why such an undertaking is destined to failure. For the assumptions which animate praxis in the Marxian conceptual constellation preclude women from participation in the utopic vision. Thus, although the feminist commitment to emancipation seems to find a common ally in Marxism, this sympathy is actually more apparent than real. For concepts like praxis turn out to be rooted in an untenable philosophical dualism between rational activity and natural proclivity, the practical realization of which finds expression in a Victorian ideology which identifies women with the natural while reserving rationality exclusively for men.

I. The Ambivalence of Praxis

I would like to begin with the critical feminist approach to Marxism known as dual systems theory. This approach attempts to clarify the relation between capitalism and patriarchy by showing the analogous themes which animate and perpetuate these systems of domination. Birke, for example, points out that these systems operate as mutually conditioning but nevertheless independent forms of power. 2 Hartmann elaborates this theme further arguing that


Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this page

Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Modern Engendering: Critical Feminist Readings in Modern Western Philosophy


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 286

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?