Preventing Biological Warfare: The Failure of American Leadership

By Malcolm R. Dando | Go to book overview
Save to active project

Introduction

In August 1972 President Nixon wrote to the United States Senate transmitting for advice and consent to ratification the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on their Destruction, that is, the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention or BTWC. In his letter President Nixon wrote:

It was about two years ago that this Government renounced, unilaterally and unconditionally, the use of all biological and toxin weapons and affirmed that we would destroy our existing stocks and confine our programs to strictly defined defensive purposes

We accompanied our renunciation of these weapons with support for the principles and objectives of the United Kingdom's 1969 draft convention in this field. On December 6, 1971, the Convention transmitted herewith, which would provide a binding international prohibition on the weapons we have renounced, was overwhelmingly commended by the General Assembly of the United Nations. 1

The President continued, ‘[T]his Convention is the first international agreement since World War II to provide for the actual elimination of an entire class of weapons from the arsenal of nations’. Hopes seemed high for, according to the President's letter, the Pine Bluff biological warfare (production) facility was to be turned into a national centre for the study of chemical contamination of the environment, while the Fort Detrick military biological research facility was to become a centre for cancer research. The Convention entered into force in 1975.

In 1996, however, the director of the United States Arms Control and Disarmament Agency (ACDA) stated the belief that: ‘twice as many countries now have or are actively pursuing offensive biological weapons programs as when the Convention went into force in 1975’. 2 This ominous doubling, in a little over two decades, of the number of countries thought to be involved in offensive biological weapons programmes included the startling example of the former Soviet Union which, along with the United States and the United Kingdom, was one of the three Depositary States for the BTWC! 3, 4 Moreover, this was no

-xii-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Preventing Biological Warfare: The Failure of American Leadership
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 231

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?