Agresti, A., Categorical Data Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1990.
Becker, Edward R., and Aviva Orenstein, “The Federal Rules of Evidence After Sixteen Years—The Effect of ‘Plain Meaning’ Jurisprudence, The Need for an Advisory Committee on the Rules of Evidence, and Suggestions for Selective Revision of the Rules,” George Washington Law Review, Vol. 60, 1992, p. 857.
Berger, Margaret A., “The Supreme Court's Trilogy on the Admissibility of Expert Evidence,” Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence, second edition, Federal Judicial Center, Washington, DC, 2000.
Cooter, Robert, and Stephen Marks, with Robert Mnookin, “Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: A Testable Model Of Strategic Behavior,” The Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 9, No. 2, 1982, pp. 225–251.
Gatowski, Sophia I., Shirley A. Dobbin, James T. Richardson, Gerald P. Ginsburg, Mara L. Merlino, and Veronica Dahir, “Asking the Gatekeepers: A National Survey of Judges on Judging Expert Evidence in a Post-Daubert World, “Law and Human Behavior, Vol. 25, No. 5, 2001, forthcoming, pp. 433–458.
Giannelli, Paul C., “Daubert: Interpreting the Federal Rules of Evidence, “Cardozo Law Review, Vol. 15, 1994, pp. 1999–2026.
Groscup, Jennifer L., Matthew T. Huss, Christina A. Studebaker, Kevin M. O'Neil, and Steven D. Penrod, “The Effects of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals on the Admissibility of Expert Testimony in State and Federal Criminal Cases,” University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Law and Psychology Program, draft paper under review, 2000.
Huber, Peter, Galileo's Revenge: Junk Science in the Courtroom, Basic Books, New York, 1993.
Johnson, Molly Treadway, Carol Krafka, and Joe S. Cecil, Expert Testimony in Federal Civil Trials: A Preliminary Analysis, Federal Judicial Center, Washington, DC, 2000.
Kakalik, James S., Terence Dunworth, Laural A. Hill, Daniel McCaffrey, Marian Oshiro, Nicholas M. Pace, and Mary E. Vaiana, Just, Speedy, and Inexpensive? An Evaluation of Judicial Case Management Under the Civil Justice Reform Act RAND, Santa Monica, CA, MR-800-ICJ, 1996.
McCormick, Charles T., Handbook of the Law of Evidence, West Publishing Co., St. Paul, 1954.
Strongs John W., “Questions Affecting the Admissibility of Scientific Evidence,” University of Illinois Law Forum, 1970, p. 1.
U.S. Government Printing Office for U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on the Judiciary, Federal Rules of Evidence, Washington, DC, 1997.
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information: Book title: Changes in the Standards for Admitting Expert Evidence in Federal Civil Cases since the Daubert Decision. Contributors: Lloyd Dixon - Author, Brian Gill - Author. Publisher: Rand Institute for Social Justice. Place of publication: Santa Monica, CA. Publication year: 2001. Page number: 89.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.