Reforms: Mexico and Colombia
This essay explores the hypothesis of a distinctive path to democratization through “reform,” with its own logic and internal structure. In this volume, this pattern of democratization is differentiated from the “foundation” of new democratic regimes, and also from democratic “transitions.” In the latter two scenarios the replacement of the previous power holders is a “strictly necessary” condition for democratization, but not so in the reform route. In the scenario under discussion here, they may retain control of the reform agenda, and democratic institutions may be installed or extended piecemeal, in the course of extended processes punctuated by advances and relapses. In contrast to other types of democratization there can only be very approximate indications of when the reform route begins, and no clarity about when it ends. None of these three scenarios can be expected to occur in pure form; the search for empirical confirmation of the hypothesis of a “reform” scenario, in particular, is clouded by the complexity of each historical example and methodological difficulties in analysis.
Nevertheless, the hypothesis is important, and requires careful consideration, both because of the refinements it introduces into the theoretical debate about the nature of democratization, and because of its relevance to hotly debated processes of political transformation in such prominent countries as contemporary Mexico. The procedure adopted in this essay
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information: Book title: Democracy in Latin America:(Re)Constructing Political Society. Contributors: Manuel Antonio Garretón M. - Editor, Edward Newman - Editor. Publisher: United Nations University Press. Place of publication: New York. Publication year: 2001. Page number: 66.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.