Comparing Religions through Law: Judaism and Islam

By Jacob Neusner; Tamara Sonn | Go to book overview
Save to active project

6

DISPROPORTIONS

In the foregoing chapters we have compared the structures of legal systems and given examples of congruent category formations, for example, shared categories of holy books of law and of theological lawyers, characteristic of both religious traditions. What results have we produced up to this point? In general outline, we have shown that that congruence is proportionate as well as topical and in important ways also substantive; to the category formations considered until now each religio-legal system assigns an equivalently formidable corpus of law. Both systems appeal to law as much as to theology to accomplish their goals. Both concur that God has plans for the social order of the faithful. Both agree upon the types of writing that convey those plans. And both put forth religious virtuosi possessed of a common core of qualifications. We might also have identified, as shared category formations, a variety of specific topics of public piety. For example, both Islam and Judaism legislate extensively concerning prayer, ablutions, fasting, and the family. Islam and Judaism agree that betrothal, marriage, inheritance, and divorce form primary concerns of their respective religious law, as does philanthropy, defining as a principal religious obligation ongoing support for the poor. 1 In all of these category formations the two religio-legal systems more or less match, even though, in details, they differ—and are bound to differ.

But the circles of Islam and of Judaism are only partially concentric, and now we turn to two ways in which each religion defines its own categories in its own way, so that comparison and contrast expose disproportions. The first way, set forth here, involves topics common to both religious traditions, in which one tradition assigns importance to a subject treated as routine and of minor consequence by the other.

In dealing with disproportions, the second way entails our identifying comparable categories; that is, finding out what functionally compares on the one side to some other, different category altogether on the other side. That involves a much more subtle exercise in taste and judgment, which we do carry out when we turn to the matter of sacred time in Islam and in Judaism. We here impose our own theoretical category—sacred time—and ask how each religious tradition legislates for an enchanted occasion delineated by the

-153-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Comparing Religions through Law: Judaism and Islam
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 264

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?