Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members. Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

X X

Cited page

Display options
Reset

Geoffrey Chaucer, the Critical Heritage

By: Derek Brewer | Book details

Contents
Look up
Saved work (0)

matching results for page

Page 285
Why can't I print more than one page at a time?
While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.

34.

JOHN WILLIAM MACKAIL, DAYLIGHT AND ROMANCE

1909

J.W. Mackail (1859-1945), educated at Balliol College, Oxford, was a man of letters and civil servant, who wrote on Classical and English Literature. Though slightly hampered by the implicit nineteenth-century theory of poetry represented by Mill and Arnold, and repeating commonplaces about childishness and dramatic quality, he nevertheless achieves an independent rich multiplicity of response to both romance and realism, praises the fabliaux, and with some originality identifies Chaucer’s highest achievement as the mingling of romance and realism in ‘Troilus and Cryseyde’. Reprinted from ‘The Springs of Helicon’, Longmans Green & Co. (1909), pp. 6-7, 49-69, by permission of Longman Group Ltd.

(p. 6) He has much of the spirit of the child, easily pleased and easily fatigued, prone to follow the suggestions of an alert but vagrant fancy.

Love is too young to know what conscience is;
Yet who knows not conscience is born of love?

And so we may see Chaucer writing sometimes with a grace and charm that are quite idle and irresponsible, and then kindling to some piteous or tragic motive, some beauty of situation or splendour of passion, until the bird-note thrills us by turning into the song of an angel.

Hence, in a world which always tends to be obtuse towards poetry, to feel safe with dulness and to take kindly to the second-best, it is not surprising that Chaucer’s fame as a poet has been much confused with false issues. It rests, or has rested, in great part on work which is not his best, or which is not his at all. To the normal modern reader he is known mainly through extracts; and it is singular how often these extracts seem chosen to miss his highest poetry, his specific greatness as a poet. We may be pretty sure to find among them the description of the Squire or the Miller, the Clerk of Oxford or the Parson—admirable sketches of character, terse, lifelike, humorous, executed in quite fluent and workmanlike verse, but not exactly poetry, or if so, only poetry with a

-285-

Select text to:

Select text to:

  • Highlight
  • Cite a passage
  • Look up a word
Learn more Close
Loading One moment ...
of 512
Highlight
Select color
Change color
Delete highlight
Cite this passage
Cite this highlight
View citation

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?