Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members. Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

X X

Cited page

Display options
Reset

Unediting the Renaissance: Shakespeare, Marlowe, Milton

By: Leah S. Marcus | Book details

Contents
Look up
Saved work (0)

matching results for page

Page 228
Why can't I print more than one page at a time?
While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.

NOTES

1 INTRODUCTION
1
Frederick C. Crews, The Pooh Perplex (1963; reprinted New York: E.P. Button, 1965).
2
For work representative of the new currents mentioned here, see D.F. McKenzie, “Printers of the Mind: Some Notes on Bibliographical Theories and Printing-House Practices,” Studies in Bibliography 22 (1969): 1-75; and his Panizzi Lectures 1985: Bibliography and the Sociology of Texts (London: British Library, 1986); Philip Gaskell, From Writer to Reader: Studies in Editorial Method (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978); Jerome J. McGann, A Critique of Modern Textual Criticism (1983; paperback edition Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1985); his The Beauty of Inflections: Literary Investigations in Historical Method and Theory (1985; reprinted Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988); and his Black Riders: The Visible Language of Modernism (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993); D.C. Greetham, Textual Scholarship: An Introduction (New York and London: Garland, 1992); his forthcoming Theories of the Text (Oxford: Oxford University Press); and Robert Darnton, “What Is the History of Books?” Daedalus 111 (1982): 65-83, and reprinted in his The Kiss of Lamourette (New York: W.W. Norton, 1990), pp. 107-35.

For the new work specifically in the field of Renaissance/early modern studies, see, for example, the Shakespearean studies by Steven Urkowitz, Shakespeare’s Revision of King Lear (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980); Gary Taylor and Michael Warren, eds, The Division of the Kingdoms: Shakespeare’s Two Versions of King Lear (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983); Stanley Wells, “The Unstable Image of Shakespeare’s Text,” in Images of Shakespeare: Proceedings of the Third Congress of the International Shakespeare Association, 1986, ed. Werner Habicht, D.J. Palmer, and Roger Pringle (Newark: University of Delaware Press; London and Toronto: Associated University Presses, 1988), pp. 305-13; Random Cloud [Randall McLeod], “The Marriage of Good and Bad Quartos,” Shakespeare Quarterly 33 (1982): 421-31; Michael D. Bristol, Shakespeare’s America, America’s Shakespeare (London and New York: Routledge, 1990), especially chap. 4, “Editing the Text: The Deuteronomic Reconstruction of Authority,” pp. 91-119; and the witty summation in Margreta de Grazia and Peter Stallybrass, “The Materiality of the Shakespearean Text,” Shakespeare Quarterly 44 (1993): 255-83, which appeared after most of the present study was written but clearly anticipates a number of my arguments. For more general studies focussed on the period, see, for example, Elizabeth L. Eisenstein, The Printing Press as an Agent of Change, 2 vols (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979); Roger

-228-

Select text to:

Select text to:

  • Highlight
  • Cite a passage
  • Look up a word
Learn more Close
Loading One moment ...
of 268
Highlight
Select color
Change color
Delete highlight
Cite this passage
Cite this highlight
View citation

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?