In this book I have sought to explore how heterosexual masculinity has been constructed in family law. I have argued that masculinity, as a discursive position, is constantly constructed within a process which has involved both resistances and challenges to the constitution of the hegemonic norm of heterosexual familialism. Legal determinations of relationships between men, women and children have involved a complex interdiscursive process through which legal discourse has brought together a range of ideas about men and masculinity. The exclusions of legal discourse—what is not said as much as what is about being a man in law—must be seen, I have argued, as an important part of the history of masculinity. At times the ideas of masculinity to be found in law can be seen to be contradictory. There is no general consistency to the representations of masculinity in law and the law does not uniformly reflect or embody an omnipotent and omnipresent male power. However, what does tend to unite the constructions of masculinity discussed above is their combined function in establishing the power of a more overarching idea—that of a familial masculinity in law.
In this final chapter I wish to draw together the themes explored in this book and, by way of conclusion to this study of masculinity, law and the family, to assess how some of the implications of this analysis might bear on the politics of changing our understandings of both masculinities and of law.
I have argued in Chapter 6 that the male subject in family law does not stand apart from manifestations of masculinity in other areas
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information: Book title: Masculinity, Law, and the Family. Contributors: Richard Collier - Author. Publisher: Routledge. Place of publication: New York. Publication year: 1995. Page number: 252.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.