“[do] not determine the question of whether they shall vote anywhere
In the 1870s, the twin premises of the New Departure—that suffrage
was a right of citizenship and that this right was national in character—
were rejected by legislators and jurists alike. In the 1880s, however, the
task of bringing new states into the Union renewed legislative attention
to the political status of Indians, Mormons, and enfranchised women
within the territories, making voting rights a subject of national concern and debate. The legacy of expansionist politics on the woman suffrage movement was, however, mixed. While territorial expansion reopened
the possibility of legislating voting rights at the national level for the
first time since Minor, it also brought the woman question to a premature life and death in the Senate. Embroiled within the ongoing tensions
of American federalism, suffrage politics in the 1880s points our attention toward some of the contradictions within a political consensus that
treated the character of the electorate as an issue of national concern—
increasingly policed through immigration and naturalization law into
the twentieth century—but left control over voting rights in the hands
of the states.
See Chapter 5, Rebecca Edwards, “Pioneers at the Polls: Woman
Suffrage in the West,” in this volume.
Susan B. Anthony to George Frisbee Hoar, 21 Feb. 1882, George
Frisbee Hoar Papers, Massachusetts Historical Society.
Congressional Record, 51st Cong., 1st sess., (26 Mar. 1890), p. 2671.
The United States government held allotted lands in trust for a period
of twenty-five years. Although the law stated that “Indians to whom
allotments have been made shall have the benefit of, and be subject to the
laws, both civil and criminal, of the State or Territory in which they may
reside,” the twenty-five year patent kept Indian allotees in a condition of
wardship. 8 Feb. 1887, Statutes at Large of the United States, 49th Cong., 2nd
sess., chap. 119, sec. 6.
3 Mar. 1887, Statutes at Large of the United States, 49th Cong., 2nd
sess., chap. 397, sec. 20.
Sarah Barringer Gordon, “‘The Liberty of Self-Degradation’: Polygamy,
Woman Suffrage and Consent in Nineteenth-Century America,” Journal of
American History 83 (Dec. 1996): 815–847.
United States v. Anthony, 24 F. 829 (U.S.C.C.N.D.N.Y., 1873).
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Book title: Votes for Women:The Struggle for Suffrage Revisited.
Contributors: Jean H. Baker - Editor.
Publisher: Oxford University Press.
Place of publication: New York.
Publication year: 2002.
Page number: 87.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may
not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.