Impediments to More Gun Controls
The fifth and last auxiliary right of the subject, that I shall at present mention, is that of having arms for their defense, suitable to their condition and degree, and such as are allowed bylaw…andis indeed a public allowance, under due restrictions, of the natural right of resistance and selfpreservation, when the sanctions of society and laws are found insufficient to restrain the violence of oppression. —William Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England
Americans also have a right to defend their homes, and we need not challenge that. Nor does anyone seriously question that the Constitution protects the right of hunters to own and keep sporting guns for hunting game any more than anyone would challenge the right to own and keep fishing rods and other equipment for fishing—or to own automobiles. To “keep and bear arms” for hunting today is essentially a recreational activity and not an imperative of survival, as it was 200 years ago; “Saturday Night Specials” and machine guns are not recreational weapons and surely are as much in need of regulation as motor vehicles. —Former U. S. Supreme Court chief justice
Warren E. Burger, “The Right to Bear Arms”
That the Second Amendment poses no barrier to strong gun laws is perhaps the most well-settled proposition in American constitutional law.
—Former solicitor general and Harvard Law School dean Erwin Griswold, “Phantom Second Amendment Rights”
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information: Book title: Can Gun Control Work?. Contributors: James B. Jacobs - Author. Publisher: Oxford University Press. Place of publication: New York. Publication year: 2002. Page number: 37.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.