Party Elites in Divided Societies: Political Parties in Consociational Democracy

By Kurt Richard Luther; Kris Deschouwer | Go to book overview
Save to active project

Series editor’s preface

Older concepts in political science may (seem to) fade away, but (it appears) they never die. This may well be an apt description of the ‘history’ of consociationalism. Its intellectual life started in the 1960s, when Lijphart, Lehmbruch, Lorwin, Daalder, Steiner and others described the apparent deviant working of parliamentary democracy in a number of smaller West European nations: the Netherlands, Belgium, Austria, Switzerland and Luxembourg. These descriptions revealed that the contemporary dominant explanation of political stability could be contested. This dominant explanation was that a blend of sociopolitical prerequisites, such as a homogeneous political culture and pluralist modes of interest intermediation, would—if and when prevalent—promote stable government. If this were not the case democracies would be characterized by centrifugal or centripetal tendencies in which party competition and interest confrontation would hamper stable democracy. This Anglo-Saxon view of the democratic world was convincingly challenged by the above-mentioned authors by means of case-study analysis. Yet, a question that remained unsolved was whether or not these deviant cases were in the final analysis only temporary and geographical idiosyncrasies and thus (more or less) exceptions to the rule.

During the 1970s and 1980s one can observe a muted debate around this issue. In part, this was because it appeared obvious that the archetypal consociational democracies were going through dramatic social and political changes, which were making them either more ‘depoliticized’ and thereby causing them to converge to, for instance, the Scandinavian style of democratic performance or less stable, like Belgium. On the other hand, some academics were attempting to ‘export’ the consociational type of democracy as a third way to (re) democratize nations that were characterized by segmentation of the population, emerging sociocultural cleavages and a fragmented political elite. The proposition that consociationalism no longer existed and the notion that consociationalism was a genuine theoretical model that could describe, or even prescribe, other (emerging) polities, both proved to be inconclusive. Yet for many, consociationalism as a specific type of democracy appeared to have become obsolete, whilst as a ‘model’of democracy, consociationalism seemed too limited.

Yet, in my view, these critical views and subsequent verdicts are not wholly correct. Admittedly, most original consociational democracies do not fit their

-xv-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Party Elites in Divided Societies: Political Parties in Consociational Democracy
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 292

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?