Becoming a Profession
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
|•||What should we call this field? Why have so many different titles emerged?|
|•||How should we define the field? Why has the field had so much difficulty reaching consensus on a definition?|
|•||What gives rise to the need for technical communication? What do most technical communicators do? What underlying problems in industry need the specialized help of technical communicators?|
|•||Given their potential contributions to organizations, why do technical communicators have so little influence in strategic decisions in their organizations? To what extent is this a crucial source of dissatisfaction for technical communicators?|
|•||What do technical communicators wish they could be doing? Why are so many dissatisfied with what they are doing now?|
These uncertainties have characterized our field for quite some time, but could also be regarded as opportunities for significant reform. They could reflect our field's healthy, ongoing struggle to come of age, to evolve into something more permanent, credible, and valued, namely a profession.
In this chapter, I argue that technical communicators need to take the following steps to move the field beyond its current uncertain status and identity so that it can become a profession:
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information: Book title: Reshaping Technical Communication: New Directions and Challenges for the 21st Century. Contributors: Barbara Mirel - Author. Publisher: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Place of publication: Mahwah, NJ. Publication year: 2002. Page number: 97.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.