Verbal Behavior and Learning: Problems and Processes: Proceedings

By Charles N. Cofer; Barbara S. Musgrave | Go to book overview
Save to active project
occurs prior to correct performance. This question reflects the crucial point of disagreement between the incremental and all-or-none positions. Empirical answers have, perhaps inevitably, been based on comparisons among items which are acquired at different rates under constant conditions of practice. Thus, item selection was entailed by the formulation of the experimental questions. The resulting bias has often made it difficult, if not impossible, to arrive at a clear-cut interpretation of the facts. Standardization of materials for difficulty may help, but norms of extremely high reliability will be required if precise quantitative predictions about the rate of associative growth are to be tested. Deductions from a particular conceptual model about the probable or possible consequences of item selection are not in the long run a satisfactory substitute for experimental control over this variable. The development of new designs which avoid the problem of item selection altogether would constitute a major methodological step toward the resolution of the present issue.The discussion has also been hampered by the fact that deductions from highly specific models have been used to test the implications of the incremental conception in its broadest sense. For example, the analysis of joint probabilities in the RTT experiment follows from the premises of the linear model in statistical learning theories. The relationship between this analysis and the deductions which follow from such incremental theories as Hull's remains to be explored. As we have emphasized, the concept of response threshold has not been considered in the derivation of predictions which are said to follow from incremental theory. Yet this concept is not only of central importance in Hull's theoretical system but is assumed explicitly or implicitly by many investigators who accept an incremental interpretation of associative growth but are not committed to any formal theoretical model. The incremental position which is part of the warp and woof of much of contemporary learning theory takes too many forms to be testable by a single experimental paradigm. Theories die hard, and crucial experiments are rarely successful in psychology. To the extent that the current controversy has led to an increasingly careful examination of the details of the learning process, it has served a useful purpose.
Clark L. L., Lansford, T. G., & Dallenbach, K. M. ( 1960) Repetition and associative learning. Amer. J. Psychol., 73, 22-40.
Estes W. K. ( 1960) Learning theory and the new "mental chemistry." Psychol. Rev., 67, 207-228.
Estes W. K. ( 1961) New developments in statistical behavior theory: Differential tests of axioms for associative learning. Psychometrika, 26, 73-84.


Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this page

Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Verbal Behavior and Learning: Problems and Processes: Proceedings


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 400

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?