Appointment, Reelection, and Autonomy
in the Senate of Chile*
Biologists can learn a great deal about plants and animals by studying how they adapt to harsh “fringe” habitats such as the desert or the tundra, evolving body structures that either shed or conserve heat, and coloration that blends into the background hues of scorched earth or snow. In a similar way, students of legislative politics can learn a great deal by studying legislatures in the “fringe habitat” of an ongoing democratic transition.
The Chilean Senate exists on the edge of democracy, operating under a constitution written in 1980 under the auspices of that country's former military government. The Senate includes 38 elected members, and during the period under study it also included 8 or 9 nonelected senators appointed by the departing military regime.1 The “binominal” system used to choose the elected senators has some “fringe features” of its own: it virtually guarantees that the party list that comes in second in each of the two member Senate districts gets one of the two seats in contention. Between the appointed senators and the electoral system, legislators friendly to the former military government control a majority of the Senate. The opposition-controlled Senate looms over the legislative process like a robber baron's castle overlooking the Rhine, and legislative initiatives must stop and pay tribute.
While the rules for choosing its members were designed to produce a Senate majority sympathetic to the former military government, they have____________________
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information: Book title: Legislative Politics in Latin America. Contributors: Scott Morgenstern - Editor, Benito Nacif - Editor. Publisher: Cambridge University Press. Place of publication: Cambridge, England. Publication year: 2002. Page number: 341.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.