The three chapters in Part I set the stage. Chapter One previews the two interwoven stories of the book. The first story is about the cultural contest in which abortion talk is shaped;the second is about whether the quality of abortion talk serves the needs of a democracy. This chapter also presents a way of thinking and a set of concepts for an analysis of discourse that can be applied to many other issues. In particular, we emphasize the way that groups work to frame issues to their advantage, attempting to mesh strategy with opportunity.
Chapter Two presents the historical context for understanding the contemporary debate on abortion in Germany and the United States. In Germany, unlike the United States, abortion has been a political issue since early in the twentieth century. Also, the highest constitutional courts in each country took different courses in their key abortion decisions in the early 1970s. The U. S. Court emphasized privacy as the central issue while the German Court emphasized the state'sresponsibility to protect life. These contrasts make the countries exceptionally well suited for our comparative study.
Chapter Three presents the nature of the data that we gathered in carrying out this research. General readers interested in the content of our argument may wish to skim or skip some of the discussion of the methodological issues that we confronted and how we resolved them.
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information: Book title: Shaping Abortion Discourse: Democracy and the Public Sphere in Germany and the United States. Contributors: Myra Marx Ferree - Author, William Anthony Gamson - Author, Jürgen Gerhards - Author, Dieter Rucht - Author. Publisher: Cambridge University Press. Place of publication: Cambridge, England. Publication year: 2002. Page number: 1.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.