Euthanasia, Ethics, and Public Policy: An Argument against Legalisation

By John Keown | Go to book overview
Save to active project

Passive euthanasia: withholding/withdrawing
treatment and tube-feeding with intent to kill

It was tempting to stop writing at the end of the last chapter and to limit the book to an elucidation and exploration of the slippery slope arguments against legalising VAE and PAS. To have stopped writing would, however, have been to ignore an aspect of the debate which, despite its importance, commands relatively little attention. This is the question whether the law and professional medical ethics do, and should, permit doctors intentionally to end patients' lives, and intentionally assist them to commit suicide, by withholding/withdrawing treatment and tube-feeding. Without at least some consideration of this question, this book would have overlooked an important dimension of the euthanasia debate. Part VI therefore considers whether English law and professional medical ethics permit passive euthanasia (PE), that is,the withholding/withdrawing of medical treatment (or tube-delivered food and fluids) by a doctor with intent to kill. Itconcludes that they do and that this is inconsistent with their continued opposition to the active, intentional killing of patients. What is said in this part in relation to English law has important implications for other jurisdictions not least the USA in which (as will be suggested in the conclusions to this Part) some courts have also moved from 'inviolability' towards 'Quality'.

Chapter 19 illustrates the English courts' condonation of PE by examining the landmark decision of the Law Lords in the Tony Bland case in 1993. Chapter 20, by analysing the BMA's recent Guidance on Withholding and Withdrawing Medical Treatment, illustrates the medical profession's acceptance of the proposition, central to the case for both VAE and NVAE, that the lives of certain patients are not worth living and that it is permissible for that reason to withhold/withdraw life-preserving treatment, or tube-feeding, from them. Chapter 21 discusses a private member's bill which sought to restore 'moral and intellectual shape' to law and medical ethics after the Bland case and the BMA guidance, and suggests that the opposition to that bill by the government and the BMA was confused and inconsistent.


Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this page

Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Euthanasia, Ethics, and Public Policy: An Argument against Legalisation


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 318

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?