Risk Assessment for Intimate Partner Homicide
JACQUELYN C. CAMPBELL, PHYLLIS SHARPS,
AND NANCY GLASS
Intimate partner homicide represents a serious health and social problem throughout the world. The majority of research on the topic has been conducted in the United States, Canada, and Australia, with only limited cross-national investigations disaggregating intimate partner homicide from other forms of homicide (Gartner, 1990; LaFree, 1998). Even with the limitations in worldwide databases, it is clear that men are universally most often the perpetrators in intimate partner homicide as with homicide in general. When women kill a husband, boyfriend, or estranged partner, they are far more likely to be acting in self-defense than are men (Wolfgang, 1958; Easteal, 1993; Browne, Williams, & Dutton, 1998). In intimate partner homicide overall, estrangement, jealousy, and prior beating of the female partner represent major risk factors (Browne et al., 1998; Smith, Moracco, & Butts, 1998). Daly and Wilson (1998) conclude that the underlying dynamics of intimate partner homicide are basically “male sexual proprietariness and female attempts to escape male control” with the actual homicide only representing the extreme of the coercive control that characterizes battering. Most data from individual countries' sources such as Africa, Australia, England, United States, and Canada support that general contention (Crawford & Gartner, 1992; Edwards, 1985; Mushanga, 1978; Easteal, 1993; Campbell, 1992).
Determination of risk of intimate partner homicide needs to be based on this underlying theoretical premise of male coercive control of females. Thus, although informed by risk of dangerousness literature from other fields (such as sexual assault and mentally disordered individuals), this chapter will concentrate on the literature specific to domestic homicide and the emerging field of risk assessment specific to domestic violence. Most experts on violence risk assessment are recom
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information: Book title: Clinical Assessment of Dangerousness: Empirical Contributions. Contributors: Georges-Franck Pinard - Editor, Linda Pagani - Editor. Publisher: Cambridge University Press. Place of publication: Cambridge, England. Publication year: 2001. Page number: 136.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.