Counterfeiting Shakespeare: Evidence, Authorship, and John Ford's Funerall Elegye

By Brian Vickers | Go to book overview

EPILOGUE
The Politics of Attribution

I introduce the term 'politics' in recognition of the fact that success in attribution studies, as in all other areas of research, is awarded not by the individual researcher but by the scholarly community. Readers who have followed my detailed analysis of the claims advanced by Gary Taylor and Donald Foster that their 'discoveries' should be admitted to the Shakespeare canon may have been struck by the gap between those claims and the paucity of evidence to support them. The question naturally arises, 'How did it all happen?' How did their case get accepted in the first place, and by what methods has it been maintained? Something truly unusual must have occurred for two such alien creations to have gained a provisional place in the Shakespeare canon, if we can grant such a status to the four one-volume editions concerned. The Norton Shakespeare, as we have seen, was obliged to include 'Shall I die?', since it had bought in the Oxford text, and justified its inclusion in the most perfunctory manner. As for the Funerall Elegye, we might expect that editors would have shown good reason for taking such a momentous step, having carefully weighed up the evidence. But it seems that no independent scholarly evaluation took place, and we are left surmising that commercial factors carried the day.

In 1997 the newly launched Norton Shakespeare had to compete in a market for college editions dominated by G. B. Evans's Riverside edition (Houghton Mifflin; first edition, 1974), 1 and David Bevington's update of the Hardin Craig edition (Addison Wesley Longman; third edition, 1980). 2 Norton stole a march on its rivals by including both 'Shall I die?' and A Funerall Elegye, a radical step that attracted much media attention. The senior editor of this production, Stephen Greenblatt, announced that 'the Norton team' had invited Donald Foster to edit A Funerall Elegye, 'a poem that raises important questions about the attribution of works to Shakespeare' (Greenblatt, et al., 1997, p. xi). Whatever those questions were, Greenblatt failed to address them, assuring readers that Foster's

-422-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this book

This book has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this book

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Counterfeiting Shakespeare: Evidence, Authorship, and John Ford's Funerall Elegye
Table of contents

Table of contents

Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen
/ 568

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.