Speaking of Race
What could be more democratic than conversation among citizens about issues of national importance? What matter is in greater need of honest, thoughtful attention than the ongoing significance of race in American public life? 1 Though convinced that the appropriate answer to the first question is “nothing” and the answer to the second is “none, ” I have misgivings about the rage for racial dialogue. But why? One answer might simply be fatigue. Late in 1997, the New York Times summed up President Bill Clinton's national conversation on race with the following headline: “The Honest Dialogue That Is Neither.” The article reflects the weariness many Americans feel about “the country's never-ending discussion of race.” 2
Yet weariness is an inadequate response when matters of injustice are at issue. And neither the inconclusiveness of the president's initiative nor the disconnection of the dialogue from substantive policy measures alters the urgency of the need for race talk. Consideration of Lani Guinier's call for “a broad public conversation about
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information: Book title: The Evidence of Things Not Said: James Baldwin and the Promise of American Democracy. Contributors: Lawrie Balfour - Author. Publisher: Cornell University Press. Place of publication: Ithaca, NY. Publication year: 2001. Page number: Not available.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.