Methods in Philosophy of Education

By Frieda Heyting; Dieter Lenzen et al. | Go to book overview
Save to active project


Antifoundationalist foundational research

Analysing discourse on children's rights to decide

Frieda Heyting

Constructivism, antifoundationalism and foundational research

The term 'constructivism' refers to a range of epistemological views which share the idea that scientific knowledge, and knowledge in general, should be understood as resulting from a process of human construction. Constructivists consider knowledge to be a product of 'assembling better instruments for prediction and control of the environment' (Rorty 1998a: 76), rather than a representation of the intrinsic nature of reality (cf. Goodman 1978; Rorty 1980). Having no means at our disposal for comparing our descriptions of reality with the mind-independent version of it, we are thrown back on our man-made perspectives and vocabularies of perceiving and describing the world, indissolubly bound to our own interests and needs.

'Facts are creatures of their descriptions' according to Goodman (1987:81). Since there are many different perspectives from which we can describe the world, every situation can be described, according to Goodman, in many different correct ('right') ways. Or, as Rorty states, we can have recourse to many different vocabularies for description. For example, the world of 'molecules' differs from that of 'values'. In addition to this, those different descriptions cannot be considered as two partial descriptions of one and the same 'external' reality. In fact, no description can be reduced to 'the' reality (Rorty 1989:11f.). In this sense, constructivists assume that there must be many worlds, each of them an artefact of its own description (Goodman 1987).

In the absence of any mind-independent access to external reality, we cannot bypass our dependence on vocabularies and perspectives. Consequently, as vocabularies and perspectives are of human origin, every description of reality must be considered 'conventional' (Goodman 1987). Not surprisingly, this leads many constructivists to the study of either individual or social processes of knowledge development, sometimes equating these processes with constructivist epistemology itself.

One tradition, reasoning from the genetic epistemology of Piaget, investigates the psychological and biological prerequisites of knowledge.


Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this page

Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Methods in Philosophy of Education


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 187

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?