United States Supreme Court has held that "Coercive police activity is the necessary predicate to finding any statement involuntary and inadmissable" (Colorado v. Connelly, 107 S. Ct. 515, 522 ). If a person is informed of his or her right to remain silent and thereafter makes incriminating voluntary statements, these may be used as evidence. But incriminating statements that are extracted by coercion or intimidation are not admissible as evidence into court. A social worker operating at the instruction of the police officer cannot do what the police officer is prohibited from doing.
REFERENCES & READINGS
Avery, L., Hutchinson, K., & Whitaker, K. (2002). Domestic violence and intergenerational rates of child sexual abuse: A case record analysis. Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal,19(1), 77-90.
Holtzworth-Munroe, A., & Herron, K. (2002). Child abuse potential: A comparison of subtypes of maritally violent men and nonviolent men. Journal of Family Violence,77(1), 1-21.
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Book title: Social Work and the Courts: A Casebook.
Contributors: Daniel Pollack - Author.
Place of publication: New York.
Publication year: 2003.
Page number: 75.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may
not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.