Liberal Democracy and Environmentalism: The End of Environmentalism?

By Marcel Wissenburg; Yoram Levy | Go to book overview
Save to active project

5

Little green lies

On the redundancy of 'environment'

Marcel Wissenburg


Introduction

Newton's model of the solar system required God's active interference to prevent the planets from drifting off. A popular story has it that when Laplace presented a new model to explain the persistence of the planets' orbits to the Corsican tyrant Bonaparte, the latter asked him where in this model God was to be found. Laplace's immortal reply was: 'Sire, I have no need of that hypothesis'. In this chapter, I hope to find out if we need the environment hypothesis.

First, let me clarify my terms. I shall use the word 'environment' to denote the shared object of analysis, concern and sometimes justification of all green movements and thinkers: environmentalists, ecologists, animal liberators, and so on. I distinguish between the concept of environment and conceptions of it: a 'concept' refers to an in some sense real-existing entity; in contrast, 'conceptions' refer to 'deeper' or (in Rawlsian terms) 'thicker' interpretations of that entity (cf. Rawls 1971). Society (for instance) is a concept; ideas like Gesellschaft and Gemeinschaft refer to interpretations, conceptions. By calling environment a concept, I emphasize a claim that I shall try to refute here, the claim that it has an epistemologically legitimate existence in the world (more precisely, in the political universe) - that is to say, it would be an idea that cannot be reduced to other concepts.

I shall use 'environmentalists' and 'environmentalism' both as general terms for all (members of) environmental movements and organizations, and for all 'green' political theories; and where appropriate to refer to a specific conception of environment. As the common object for environmentalists in the strict sense, 'environment' refers to everything which surrounds humans, in particular (but not necessarily) the parts that have not (yet) been substantially transformed by humans. A human-made forest is still a forest; it is substantially transformed when it is turned into paper. This is a rough definition, not without problems, but it will do for now. Ecologists refer to their object as being 'the ecology', a system of entities, subsystems and relations that must be understood as a whole. Humankind is inseparably part of this ecology. Again, this is a rough but functional definition. Animal liberators refer to their object, among others, as being species within or individual members of the set of non-human 'animals', who are either part of 'nature' or live as domesticated creatures. This is an even more questionable definition, but again, it is sufficient for now.

-60-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Liberal Democracy and Environmentalism: The End of Environmentalism?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 220

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?