Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members. Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

X X

Cited page

Display options
Reset

The Development of Autism: Perspectives from Theory and Research

By: Jacob A. Burack; Tony Charman et al. | Book details

Contents
Look up
Saved work (0)

matching results for page

Page 195
Why can't I print more than one page at a time?
While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.

10
A Cognitive Complexity
and Control Framework
for the Study of Autism
Philip David Zelazo
University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Jacob A. Burack
McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Janet J. Boseovski
Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Sophie Jacques
University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Douglas Frye
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

Introduction: Autism and Theory of Mind

Typical development serves as a standard that can be used to assess the occurrence and severity of deviance and delay in various atypical populations. In turn, the study of atypical development informs our understanding of typical development—for example, by allowing researchers to identify necessary relations among cognitive structures (Cicchetti, 1984; Hodapp & Burack, 1990). One area that well illustrates the mutually beneficial nature of the typical—atypical relation is research on theory of mind—the ability to attribute mental states to oneself and to others (e.g., Astington, 1993). In a seminal article, Baron-Cohen, Leslie, and Frith (1985) reported that high-functioning individuals with autism performed worse than did mental-age-matched individuals with Down Syndrome on a test of theory of mind. A subsequent study (Baron-Cohen, Leslie, & Frith, 1986) reported that the same individuals with autism were impaired on theory-of-mind tasks but not on other types of task, such as a mechanical (physical) causality task in which reasoning about mental states was not required.

-195-

Select text to:

Select text to:

  • Highlight
  • Cite a passage
  • Look up a word
Learn more Close
Loading One moment ...
of 374
Highlight
Select color
Change color
Delete highlight
Cite this passage
Cite this highlight
View citation

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?