Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members. Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

X X

Cited page

Display options
Reset

The Longest Night: Polemics and Perspectives on Election 2000

By: Arthur J. Jacobson; Michel Rosenfeld | Book details

Contents
Look up
Saved work (0)

matching results for page

Page 142
Why can't I print more than one page at a time?
While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.

NOTES

Iwish to thank Robert Bennett, Larry Kramer, and Rick Pildes for helpful comments.

1
531 U.S. 98; 121 S. Ct. 525 (2000).
2
121 S. Ct. at 542.
3
121 S. Ct. at 529.
4
Article II of the Constitution provides in relevant part that “Each state shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a number of Electors, equal to the whole number of Senators and Representatives to which the state may be entitled in Congress.”
5
See New York Times, 36 Days: The Complete Chronicle of the 2000 Presidential Election Crisis (New York: Times Books, 2001), 300–301. It is not clear, however, that the Florida legislature's unilateral action would have been consistent with federal law.
6
See U.S. Const. amend. XVII (1913).
7
See 36 Days, at 319.
8
The 435 congressional districts represented in the House of Representatives are supposed to be made up of roughly equal size populations. Moreover, the number of presidential electors assigned to each state is determined by adding two electors (representing the state's two senators) to a number of electors equivalent to the number of congressional districts in that state. In 2000 Montana and Wyoming each had one congressional district and hence 3 presidential electors. California had 52 congressional districts and 54 electors; New York, 31 congressional districts and 33 electors. Consistent with this, from the standpoint of the individual voter, the voter in a small state has a weightier vote than the voter in a large state. When other considerations are factored in, however, the resulting picture becomes much more complex. See Robert W. Bennett, “Popular Election of the President without a Constitutional Amendment, this vol., chap. 22.
9
Cf. U.S. Const. art. I, § 2, cl. 1. 3, providing that each slave should be counted as three-fifths of a person, thus boosting the number of congressional districts and presidential electors of slave-owning states without having to extend the franchise to the slave population in the state.
10
See 121 S. Ct. at 541, n4.
11
Id.
12
See 36 Days, at 36–38, 91–92 (describing problems encountered by African Americans during the 2000 presidential election in Florida).
13
See U.S. Const. art. II, § 1; and amend. XII (1804).
14
See 36 Days, at 32, 34, 36, 152.
15
Id., at 336–37.
16
Id., at 339–40.
17
Id., at 301, 308–9.
18
Id., at 134–35.
19
See U.S. Const. art. II, § 1; and amend. XII (1804).
20
121 S. Ct. at 512 (emphasis added).
21
121 S. Ct. at 513.
22
See Antonin Scalia, “Common-Law Courts in a Civil-Law System: The Role

-142-

Select text to:

Select text to:

  • Highlight
  • Cite a passage
  • Look up a word
Learn more Close
Loading One moment ...
of 417
Highlight
Select color
Change color
Delete highlight
Cite this passage
Cite this highlight
View citation

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?