How Political Parties Respond: Interest Aggregation Revisited

By Kay Lawson; Thomas Poguntke | Go to book overview

10

Latecomers but 'early-adapters'

The adaptation and response of Spanish parties to social changes

Luis Ramiro and Laura Morales

Compared with other Western countries, Spain has a short history of democratic party politics. Democratic government and party competition, prior to the 1970s, was reduced to the brief and turbulent period of the Second Republic (1931-36). After a long authoritarian regime, the death of General Franco in 1975 and the first democratic elections of 1977 heralded the longest era of democratic politics in Spanish history.

One of the main features of the party system that emerged in the 1970s was its discontinuity with respect to the previous democratic experience of the 1930s. On the one hand, the dynamics of the party system that was formed in 1977, and the patterns of interaction among its units, were defined by the strong tendency towards centripetal competition and ideological moderation (Gunther et al. 1986; Montero 1994). This was fundamentally different from the ideological polarization that dominated the dynamics of the Spanish party system during the 1930s. On the other hand, only some of the political parties that ran for the first democratic elections after the dictatorship had participated in the previous democratic regime. And even these had experienced important organizational and ideological changes (Linz and Montero 1999). 1

Spanish political parties regained their political activity in a different setting from that of the 1930s. But the context was also different from the one Western parties faced after the Second World War in countries such as Italy and Germany. It is commonplace to consider the social and political environment that Spanish political parties faced in the 1970s as one of the main determinants of their basic features (Linz and Montero 1999). First, political parties had to build their organizations quickly within a political culture characterized by demobilization and depoliticization (López Pintor 1982; Rodríguez Ibáñez 1987). Second, certain social changes - urbanization, expansion of universal education, secularization and increasing levels of wealth - hindered the possibilities for political parties to establish strong linkages with selected social strata. Third, the transition to and consolidation of democracy took place in a moment in which the expansion of television had a radical impact on political communication and, consequently, on party organizations. Finally, Spanish

-198-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this book

This book has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this book

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
How Political Parties Respond: Interest Aggregation Revisited
Table of contents

Table of contents

  • Title Page iii
  • Contents v
  • Illustrations vii
  • 1 - Do Parties Respond? 1
  • 2 - Speaking for Whom? 15
  • 3 - From Disaster to Landslide 41
  • 4 - From People's Movements to Electoral Machines? 61
  • 5 - From Aggregation to Cartel? 86
  • 6 - How Parties in Government Respond 105
  • 7 - Reaggregating Interests? 129
  • 8 - Radicals, Technocrats and Traditionalists 146
  • 9 - Paying for Party Response 176
  • 10 - Latecomers but 'Early-Adapters' 198
  • 11 - Representative Rule or the Rule of Representations 227
  • 12 - Five Variations on a Theme 250
  • Index 267
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen
/ 271

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.