Empirical Direction in Design and Analysis

By Norman H. Anderson | Go to book overview
Save to active project

EXERCISES FOR CHAPTER 17
1. How can a single experiment produce multiple false alarms? Multiple false alarms and multiple misses?
2. In the numerical example of Student–Newman range test, verify that the final outcome is the separation of the means into the following three subsets, each of which contains means that are not statsig different.

{A, B}, {B, C, D}, and {C, D, E}.

a. Which two-mean comparisons are statsig?
b. You notice that the means seem to fall into two clusters, {A, B} and {C, D, E}. Use the formula in Note 4.1.1b to get 14.83 ± 7.38 as a 95% confidence interval for the difference between the means of the two clusters. How much confidence do you have that this clustering is real?
3. You test four experimental conditions but the overall Anova falls somewhat short of statsig. However, your research assistant points out that your four experimental conditions form a clear a priori rank order and suggests that a linear trend test would be most effective. What do you do?
4. a. Show that the one-for-two rule of Section 17.3.2 yields α3 =.074 for a = 3 conditions. Compare with Student–Newman procedure.
5. In the familywise test of inverted-U shape (Section 17.4.2):
a. What is the null hypothesis? Why is this null hypothesis appropriate?
b. What is the familywise α if H0 is true?
c. Suppose the expected maximum condition had not been specified beforehand, but selected by inspection of the data. Why exactly would this invalidate the analysis? What modification is needed in this case?
d. Would you have any preference between Newman–Ryan and Tukey procedures for this question of inverted U shape?
6. With one-way design, a statsig range always demonstrates a two-mean difference, whereas a statsig F says only that not all true means are equal with little information about which means differ from which. Hence a range procedure such as Student–Newman might seem preferable to the overall F. Although the range procedures may have a little less power in most situations, they go beyond the overall F to say which means differ from which.

So: Why not make range procedures standard and forget about overall Anova? As a bonus, much material of previous chapters could be omitted; learning statistics would be much easier. What reason can you see for retaining the overall F for one-way designs?

-548-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Empirical Direction in Design and Analysis
Table of contents

Table of contents

Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 864

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?