During the twentieth century, the privately-owned electric utility was regulated as a natural monopoly. According to the natural monopoly paradigm, a vertically-integrated electric utility provided generation, transmission, and distribution service to all customers within a geographic service territory. While the firm was allowed to operate as a monopolist, it also had certain responsibilities: it submitted to price regulation and assumed obligations to extend service to all customers within its geographic service territory and to continue providing service, once service had commenced (Haar & Fessler, 1986).
With the advent of deregulation, it is assumed that markets will largely displace price regulation, but little discussion focuses on the implications of deregulation for utility service obligations in the electricity industry. Today, electric utilities' extraordinary service obligations-often collectively referred to as the “duty to serve”-face their largest challenge ever. The potential conflict between universal service and retail competition in electricity bears
The End of a Natural Monopoly: Deregulation and Competition in the Electric Power Industry, Volume 7, pages 141-167.
Copyright © 2003 by Elsevier Science Ltd.
All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information: Book title: The End of a Natural Monopoly: Deregulation and Competition in the Electric Power Industry. Contributors: Peter Z. Grossman - Editor, Daniel H. Cole - Editor. Publisher: JAI Press. Place of publication: Boston. Publication year: 2003. Page number: 141.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.