Theoretical postscript

Deeply rooted in European culture are certain stories about language. The Old Testament of the Bible tells of a single original language, spoken by Adam in naming the objects around him. The subsequent splitting of this one language into several mutually unintelligible ones was God's punishment. During the period of their ancient empire, the Greeks too looked back to a linguistic past they felt was better, the 'Golden Age' of Homer's epics. In both traditions, then, there is a sense of linguistic decline.

Such stories of linguistic decline are still very powerful today when, like the Greeks, we apply them to a particular language. This is partly because they overlap with a more general sense that manners and behaviour are not what they were. But it is also possible to see the opposite tendency when particular languages are discussed: the story is not one of decline but progress, overlapping with an opposing tendency to see the past as characterised by ignorance, cruelty and want, conditions from which we are lucky to have been delivered.

Also widespread is a third kind of story which combines elements of both: a language will degenerate if it is not cared for, but can be maintained and even improved by dint of great effort. So Dr Johnson on p. xv of the Preface to his Dictionary, looking back over a thousand years of linguistic history, thought the Anglo-Saxons might have been

a people without learning, and very probably without an alphabet; their speech therefore, having been always cursory and extemporaneous, must have been artless and unconnected, without any modes of transition or involution of clauses; which abruptness and inconnection may be observed even in their later writings. This barbarity may be supposed to have continued during their wars with the Britains, which for a time left them no leisure for softer studies; nor is there any reason for supposing it abated, till the year 570, when

-255-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
A Social History of English
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 301

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?