The Obesity Epidemic: Science, Morality, and Ideology

By Michael Gard; Jan Wright | Go to book overview
Save to active project

3

The ghost of a machine

At this point it may be tempting to think that the occasional excesses that media coverage inevitably entails are one thing, but that the science of the 'obesity epidemic' is quite another. However, it is not difficult to find examples from the scientific literature in which the current situation is similarly described in cataclysmic terms. Seidell (2000), for example, claims that there may be one billion overweight and obese people in the world: that is, one billion people who are sufficiently fat to be classified as 'diseased' on account of their body weight alone. The situation is regularly described as an obesity 'crisis' (Beebe 2002; Deckelbaum and Williams 2001; Ebbeling et al. 2002; Klein 2004), requiring a 'war on obesity' (Friedman 2003; Klein 1999).

As we saw in the quote from Bouchard and Blair (1999) in Chapter 1, the diagnosis of too much food and not enough physical activity is generally taken to be self-evident in the scientific literature. In fact, it seems that many researchers in this area have moved past asking why the 'obesity epidemic' is happening to the development of strategies to reduce the number of calories people consume and to increase the calories they expend (e.g. Hill and Peters 1998; Peters et al. 2002). Chakravarthy and Booth (2003:731) claim that by 'watching less TV, eating fewer higher-calorie fast foods, and being more physically active the current rising physical inactivity and obesity epidemics can be thwarted'.

At the risk of oversimplification, this assessment seems to be saying that 'we know that overweight and obesity are serious diseases, we know what causes them, and, in broad terms, we know what to do about them'. Over the course of this and the following three chapters, we offer an alternative perspective. We survey the scientific literature and argue that there are, in fact, many aspects of both the causes and consequences of overweight and obesity, which are poorly understood. We ask, if it is the case that the causes and consequences of overweight and obesity are unclear; how is it possible to speak about a present crisis and a future calamity with the air of certainty which characterizes much of the scientific literature? Is it possible that the apparent uniformity of the view that too much food and not enough physical activity has produced a global health crisis has more to do with cultural attitudes towards fatness than the weight of scientific evidence? Chakravarthy and Booth (2003:731) describe the current sedentary and obesity-promoting lives which (they allege) Westerners increasingly live as 'sedentary death syndrome'. Elsewhere, however, Bouchard and Blair claim that:

-37-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
The Obesity Epidemic: Science, Morality, and Ideology
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 218

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?