Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members. Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

X X

Cited page

Display options
Reset

Critical Political Ecology: The Politics of Environmental Science

By: Tim Forsyth | Book details

Contents
Look up
Saved work (0)

matching results for page

Page 134
Why can't I print more than one page at a time?
While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.

6

Enforcing and contesting boundaries

Boundary organizations and social movements
This chapter now looks in more detail at the political processes and actors that contribute to the adoption of dominant environmental explanations. The chapter will:
discuss the dilemmas of analyzing structure and agency in science-policy, or how specific “actors” may replicate, reform, or co-construct the boundaries or networks of environmental science;
introduce the concept of “boundary organization” as a means of analyzing organizations that shape and enforce linkages between science and policy. The chapter provides examples of boundary organizations from state and non-state sectors, and considers their influence on current topics of environmental debate such as carbon-offset forestry;
analyze further how social movements, as a potent source of social resistance, may challenge or reinforce dominant forms of environmental explanation. This section also includes a critique of some current approaches to political ecology, including resource mobilization and advocacy coalitions, and the impact of social movements on environmental discourses.

The aim of this chapter is to contribute to a “critical” political ecology by showing how environmental politics and actors may shape, and be shaped by, environmental science. Later chapters discuss how this knowledge may be used to increase the transparency and public participation in the formulation of environmental science.


Structure and agency in science-policy

The discussion in Chapter 5 showed that environmental science does not exist in isolation from social debates. Political activism and social concerns influence how environmental changes are framed, and these then affect the objectives and outcomes of environmental science. When scientific statements are seen to be politically neutral and authoritative, they may reinforce the original concerns and framings, and imply these are universally applicable to all people. Such co-construction of science and politics

-134-

Select text to:

Select text to:

  • Highlight
  • Cite a passage
  • Look up a word
Learn more Close
Loading One moment ...
of 320
Highlight
Select color
Change color
Delete highlight
Cite this passage
Cite this highlight
View citation

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?