Maybe it has to be stressed that it is not a linguistic trick to translate women's oppression into influence and power. This question is of fundamental importance. If there is no grain of influence or power bestowed on women, and male power is viewed as all-embracing, the gender-power approach itself becomes analytically ineffective. This assumption also means that women are without means to influence the evolving trends we now witness. The patterns we have depicted are based on interviews with people with healthcare occupations. However, they are by no means specific to these groups. Similar trends are found in all classes, as indicated by my Icelandic study on men on paternity leave. Nevertheless, further research is needed in order to better understand the impact of class positions and how the interaction of spouses can be conceptualized against a background of class-based resources.
This chapter has attempted to introduce new paths in the discourse of family interaction. The discussion implies that well-known patterns of sharing household tasks, parental leave, and such detachable matters, can be taken a step further and scrutinized in terms of the logic, or spirit, of interaction. By this we are trying to come to grips with a whole that is more than the sum of its parts. We have seen different configurations emerging from the same or similar patterns of division of housework. The importance of this new approach may be symbolically demonstrated by the position of Anna and Christer's interaction. Ironically, they probably represent the most “equal” couple of all in our examples, in terms of quantitative contributions. But their “equality” is realized in “the worst of worlds”: they are running a household with an “empty” inner core, and with their “real” lives located outside the home.
Ahrne, G. and Roman, C. (1997). Hemmet, barnen och makten. Förhandlingar om arbete ochpengar ifamiljen. Stockholm: SOU 1997.
Åström, L. (1990). Fäder och söner. Bland svenska män i tre generationer. Stockholm: Carlsons.
Bäck-Wiklund, M. and Bergsten, B. (1997). Det moderna föräldraskapet. En studie av familj och kön i förändring. Stockholm: Natur och Kultur.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Moving towards a New Modernity. London, Sage.
Bekkengen, L. (1996). Mäns föräldraledighet-en kunskapsöZversikt. Karlstad: Högskolan i Karlstad. Arbetsrapport 96:12.
Bekkengen, L. (1999). Man som 'pappor' och kvinnor som 'föräldrar.' Kvinnovetenskaplig tidskrift, 1/1999.
Björnberg, U. and Kollind, A-K. (1997). Negotiations about Family Responsibilities within Dual-earner Families. Theoretical Perspectives. In J. Holmer and J. Karlson (Eds.), Work-Quo Vadis? Re-thinking the Question of Work. Singapore, Sydney: Ashgate.
Björnberg, U. (1994). Mäns familjeorientering i förändring. In U. Björnberg et. al. (Eds.), Janus och Genus. Om kön och social identitet i familj och samhälle. Stockholm: Brombergs.
Castells, M. (1997). The Power of Identity. Oxford: Blackwell.
Clatterbaugh, K. (1990). Contemporary Perspectives on Masculinity. Men, Women and Politics in Modern Society. Boulder, Colorado.
Einarsdottir, T. (1998). Through Thick and Thin. Icelandic Men on Paternity Leave. The Committee on Gender Equality, City of Reykjavik.
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Book title: Autonomy and Dependence in the Family: Turkey and Sweden in Critical Perspective.
Contributors: Rita Liljeström - Editor, Elisabeth Özdalga - Editor.
Place of publication: London.
Publication year: 2002.
Page number: 214.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may
not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.