On Law, Politics, and Judicialization

By Martin Shapiro; Alec Stone Sweet | Go to book overview
Save to active project

Political Jurisprudence

Martin Shapiro

A school of jurisprudence rarely emerges full-blown at a single instant or immediately announces itself as something new and different in the world of legal scholarship. Bentham's Principles of Morals and Legislation, one of the most startlingly original and seminal contributions to modern legal thought, might have been greeted by one of today's omniscient and pinch-minded reviewers, transplanted back to 1789, as 'a rather interesting application of the thought of several minor continental writers to English conditions'. While we can now trace a whole Kantian school of legal theory, it still remains questionable whether Kant himself had a theory of law. Furthermore, the contemporary world does not often find itself blessed with such commanding figures as Bentham and Kant. New intellectual movements are more often the collective work of smaller minds and the products of synthesis, recombination, and shifting application of existing ideas. I believe that such a new movement is afoot in legal theory, and I propose to call it 'political jurisprudence'.

This new movement is essentially an extension of certain elements of sociological jurisprudence and judicial realism combined with the substantive knowledge and methodology of political science. Its foundation is the sociological jurist's premise that law must be understood not as an independent organism but an integral part of the social system. Political jurisprudence is, in one sense, an attempt to advance sociological jurisprudence by greater specialization. It seeks to overcome the rather nebulous and over-general propositions of the earlier movement by concentrating on the specifically political aspects of law's interaction with society and describing the concrete impact of legal arrangements on the distribution of power and rewards among the various elements in a given society.


Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this page

Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
On Law, Politics, and Judicialization


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 417

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?