# Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies

By Russell J. Dalton; Martin P. Wattenberg | Go to book overview

Appendix

Measuring Significance

This appendix discusses how to measure the significance of changes in public opinion over time. Two methodologies have been used in the public opinion literature. The time-series approach uses each survey result as a single point in a time series, and assesses the statistical significance of changes based on trends across surveys with the N equal to the number of separate national samples. This methodology was used to measure trends in partisanship in Chapter 2 , as well as some of the aggregate statistics on party change in Chapter 3 . It is equivalent to analyses of aggregate economic statistics or other national characteristics over time.

In contrast, the survey approach focuses on the raw survey data, measuring whether the differences in opinions over two or more surveys are statistically significant. Because these comparisons are based on large survey samples, the N for these comparisons is quite large—usually several thousand or more.

Employing these two techniques on the same cross-sectional data will yield dramatic=ally different estimates of statistical significance because of the large differences in the N used in calculating probability statistics. A brief example based on changes in American party identification can illustrate the effects of the two approaches. Between 1964 and 1970 the percentage of Americans identifying with a political party declined by a sizeable amount:

Using the time-series technique, one gets the following insignificant results:

b = -1.13, se = 0.38, sig = 0.099, N=4

In contrast, if one analyses the cumulative file of surveys from these four years, and calculates a regression model predicting identification with a party (coded 0,1) by year of interview, the following results are revealed:

b = -1.15, se=0.003, sig = 0.0000, N=5,925

The two methodologies thus give nearly identical estimates of the per annum changes because they are measuring the same trend over time. The time-series analysis is not statistically significant because of the small number of surveys upon which it is based. In contrast, the analysis based on individual data has a much greater N—being based upon individual interviews rather than timepoints—and thus the results are very highly significant.

Some recent research on comparative public opinion trends has used the time-series method (e.g. Klingemann and Fuchs 1995). If one had access to the raw survey data, we believe that it would be more appropriate to base the statistical analysis on the survey

-62-

If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

#### Items saved from this book

This book has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.
Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.
Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this book

Project items include:
• Saved book/article
• Highlights
• Quotes/citations
• Notes
• Bookmarks
Notes

#### Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

#### Cited page

Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies

Settings

Typeface
Text size
Search within

Look up

#### Look up a word

• Dictionary
• Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen
/ 314

## Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

## Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

## Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.