Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members. Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

X X

Cited page

Display options
Reset

Environment and Statecraft: The Strategy of Environmental Treaty-Making

By: Scott Barrett | Book details

Contents
Look up
Saved work (0)

matching results for page

Page 268
Why can't I print more than one page at a time?
While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.

Appendix 9.1

Derivation of Figure 9.1

Figure 9.1 assumes that payoffs are given by

with qi{0, 1}. Then, if Qi = 0, i will play qi = 0 provided c > b > 0. Suppose, however, that Qi = N1. Then, since N > c/b by assumption, i will play qi = 1. Indeed, depending on the parameter values, if “enough” countries play Abate, then each will prefer to play Abate. To be precise, country i will play Abate provided

The game illustrated in Figure 9.1 assumes b = 1, c = 2.5, and N = 5.


Derivation of Figure 9.2

Figure 9.2 assumes that payoffs take the form:

where α, β, γ, and δ are parameters (with non-negative values) and where ti takes on a value of 1 if i adopts the segregated ballast tank (SBT) technology and a value of 0 if it does not. The parameter α takes on a value between zero and one; α = 1 implies that the technology standard is just as effective in reducing emissions as the performance standard (assuming full compliance). The parameter γ is the cost of installing the SBT technology and the final term captures the network externality. This shows that if i does not adopt the technology, then it incurs a cost that increases in the number of countries that do adopt the technology—i's tankers are now shut out of these markets (of course, the environmental benefit to i of other countries adopting SBT is included in the bracketed term). Put differently, as long as δ is less than one, there is a benefit to i of adopting SBT that increases in the number of others that adopt SBT.

Notice that, so long as ti = 0 for all i, the above game is identical to the game studied in Chapter 7 . This is the prisoners' dilemma shown in Figure 9.2(a) . By contrast, setting qi = 0 for all i yields Figure 9.2(b) . The network externality makes this game a coordination game. The games shown in Figure 9.2 assume b = 1, c = 3.5, α = 1, γ = 5, β = 1, δ = 0.9, and N = 10.

-268-

Select text to:

Select text to:

  • Highlight
  • Cite a passage
  • Look up a word
Learn more Close
Loading One moment ...
of 438
Highlight
Select color
Change color
Delete highlight
Cite this passage
Cite this highlight
View citation

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?