“The Cold Sweat of Death” Texas Prosecession and Antisecession Politics
In September 1860, Texas politician Louis Trezevant Wigfall spoke in Tyler, Texas, where he outlined the pending political crisis. 1. With the importance of slavery to the political and economic life of Texans increasing, Texas's interest in the sectional conflict heightened. Southern political leaders such as Wigfall believed that if Abraham Lincoln won the upcoming presidential election, it would be a direct threat to the Southern way of life. A little more than two months after Wigfall spoke to the Tyler crowd, Abraham Lincoln's election victory in November 1860 heightened the fears of Southerners and Texans. They believed that Lincoln and the Republican Party would trample on individual rights by preventing the spread of slavery, and possibly worse—the full abolition of slavery. Consequently, politicians began to speak out about the state of the Union and the concern of individual states in this crisis. They spoke not only to clarify their interests and the interests of their constituents, but also to either support or refute the secession of Southern states.
Over the years, arguments have appeared attempting to explain the complexity of Texas's secession from the Union. The first thesis emerged during the Civil War when many individuals viewed secession as the work of radical fire-eaters and conspirators, leaders who were antidemocratic, who led the people to believe that only secession could guarantee the preservation of Southern rights and Southern institutions. In Texas, these sentiments sprang mainly from Union supporters who fled north once hostilities began to erupt. 2. In the early twentieth century with the need for a “new South” argument,____________________
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information: Book title: Texas in the Confederacy: An Experiment in Nation Building. Contributors: Clayton E. Jewett - Author. Publisher: University of Missouri Press. Place of publication: Columbia, MO. Publication year: 2002. Page number: 11.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.